The two versions are separate branches with some significant differences. Here is a quick overview of the differences:
|
Version 1 |
Version 2 |
| Number of entities |
zero |
zero |
| Dimensions |
dimensions in schema |
named dimensions as data |
| Data held in |
unit_details relation |
unit attribute |
| Prefixes |
built into scaled units |
built in and separate data |
| Unit type |
enum utype attribute |
subtyping unit attribute |
| Quantity kind |
can be added in a measure |
same as dimension_type |
For a more complete overview see the presentation here: Open-Source Community Project: TypeDB Units. A comparison between the two versions occurs at time stamp 36:47.
I'll create two comments below (one for each version) and you can vote by adding a thumbs up or thumbs down. Please provide input about which parts you like and don't like. Input both positive and negative will help us shape TypeDB-Units into a system that works for all applications.
The two versions are separate branches with some significant differences. Here is a quick overview of the differences:
unit_detailsrelationunitattributeutypeattributeunitattributemeasuredimension_typeFor a more complete overview see the presentation here: Open-Source Community Project: TypeDB Units. A comparison between the two versions occurs at time stamp 36:47.
I'll create two comments below (one for each version) and you can vote by adding a thumbs up or thumbs down. Please provide input about which parts you like and don't like. Input both positive and negative will help us shape TypeDB-Units into a system that works for all applications.