Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
|
I’ve asked this with the team, and we found that it’s a lot of maintenance to publish raw TS files, manage bundled dependencies, handle inlined types etc that it’s not worth publishing to JSR at the moment. You mentioned willing to make a PR for the initial setup, but I think the maintenance thereafter is something we want to avoid for now. Maybe we can revisit this in the future if JSR has a laxer publishing rules. (Or if they do but we missed it) |
1 reply
|
Isn't JSR a superset of npm? Based on my understanding of how JSR works, if you publish your package to JSR, it will automatically be available on npm as well. So, you only need to maintain it in one place (JSR) |
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Are you open to publishing vite to jsr.io alongside npm registry?
some examples of projects that have started publishing to jsr:
Hono
https://deno.com/blog/hono-on-jsr
Supabase
https://deno.com/blog/supabase-on-jsr
On your end you just need to signup and claim the
@vitescope. Then I'm happy to make a PR and take care of the restAll reactions