Conversation
![aikido-pr-checks[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/898896?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| savedPath string, | ||
| lookup func(context.Context) (CertSetting, error), | ||
| ) (CertSetting, error) { | ||
| if data, err := os.ReadFile(savedPath); err == nil { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential file inclusion attack via reading file - medium severity
If an attacker can control the input leading into the ReadFile function, they might be able to read sensitive files and launch further attacks with that information.
Show fix
Remediation: Ignore this issue only after you've verified or sanitized the input going into this function.
Reply @AikidoSec ignore: [REASON] to ignore this issue.
More info
| if err != nil { | ||
| continue // shell not installed | ||
| } | ||
| out, err := platform.RunAsCurrentUserWithPathEnv(ctx, shellPath, lookup.Args...) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
platform.RunAsCurrentUserWithPathEnv error is ignored; add logging or an explanatory comment to justify swallowing the error.
Details
✨ AI Reasoning
An error-from-external-process case is being silently ignored with no logging, re-throwing, or comment. Silently swallowing errors from invoking user shells can hide failures and make debugging difficult; a minimal log or explicit intent comment would clarify why the error is ignored.
🔧 How do I fix it?
Add proper error handling in catch blocks. Log the error, show user feedback, or rethrow if needed.
Reply @AikidoSec feedback: [FEEDBACK] to get better review comments in the future.
Reply @AikidoSec ignore: [REASON] to ignore this issue.
More info
| content := "" | ||
| if data, err := os.ReadFile(path); err == nil { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential file inclusion attack via reading file - high severity
If an attacker can control the input leading into the ReadFile function, they might be able to read sensitive files and launch further attacks with that information.
Show fix
| content := "" | |
| if data, err := os.ReadFile(path); err == nil { | |
| if strings.Contains(path, "..") { | |
| return fmt.Errorf("invalid file path") | |
| } | |
| content := "" | |
| if data, err := os.ReadFile(path); err == nil { |
| body = strings.ReplaceAll(body, "\r\n", "\n") | ||
| if newline != "\n" { | ||
| body = strings.ReplaceAll(body, "\n", newline) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return os.WriteFile(path, []byte(stripped+BuildManagedBlock(body, format, newline)), perm) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Function parameter 'body' is reassigned (body = strings.ReplaceAll(...)). Avoid mutating parameters; assign to a new local variable (e.g., normalizedBody) before further processing.
Show fix
| body = strings.ReplaceAll(body, "\r\n", "\n") | |
| if newline != "\n" { | |
| body = strings.ReplaceAll(body, "\n", newline) | |
| } | |
| return os.WriteFile(path, []byte(stripped+BuildManagedBlock(body, format, newline)), perm) | |
| normalizedBody := strings.ReplaceAll(body, "\r\n", "\n") | |
| if newline != "\n" { | |
| normalizedBody = strings.ReplaceAll(normalizedBody, "\n", newline) | |
| } | |
| return os.WriteFile(path, []byte(stripped+BuildManagedBlock(normalizedBody, format, newline)), perm) |
Details
✨ AI Reasoning
A function parameter is reassigned to a new string value. Reassigning parameters can obscure the original argument and make debugging harder; here 'body' is normalized in-place which hides the original input. This is a conservative quality concern because transforming inputs is common, but in-place reassignment reduces clarity.
Reply @AikidoSec feedback: [FEEDBACK] to get better review comments in the future.
Reply @AikidoSec ignore: [REASON] to ignore this issue.
More info
1 participant
Useful for when we add new tools here, otherwise it'll become a mess overlooking this
Summary by Aikido
🚀 New Features
⚡ Enhancements
🔧 Refactors
More info