Use path halving in unionfind to improve performance#404
Merged
christian-rauch merged 1 commit intoOct 7, 2025
Merged
Conversation
eeb228e to
606adbb
Compare
Collaborator
|
I converted to Draft, since you are still pushing to the PR. Once you are ready for the actual review, mark this PR as ready and let me know. |
(cherry picked from commit eeb228e)
606adbb to
717dab5
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
@christian-rauch I accidentally pushed to this branch instead of a new one for a different optimization. It's ready for your review now |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Do path halving instead of path compression in unionfind. This makes the clustering take approximately 46ms instead of 52ms on my 6MP test image.