continuous-integration2: Switch to ruff for Python formatting

[nathanchance]

We started using ruff for linting a while ago. Since then, it has grown a formatting option, which is quite fast. While it is a little less flexible than yapf, we don't currently customize the behavior aside from some exemptions.

Switch to ruff for formatting. Most of the changes end up making the code a little more readable, at the expense of some extra lines. Switch to the generic fmt comments instead of the yapf specific ones. Use the option to preserve our quoting style, which uses single quotes for string literals and double quotes for f-string or raw strings.

NOTE: The linting job will not succeed until ClangBuiltLinux/actions-workflows#11 is merged.

[JustinStitt]

I feel like a couple of the formatting changes it made kinda suck

For example:

- x["name"] for x in json.loads(list_response.content)["variables"]
+ x["name"]
+ for x in json.loads(list_response.content)["variables"]

... but I suspect this repo is getting nuked soon so I'm not blocking over this 😆

[nathanchance]

I feel like a couple of the formatting changes it made kinda suck

For example:

- x["name"] for x in json.loads(list_response.content)["variables"]
+ x["name"]
+ for x in json.loads(list_response.content)["variables"]

... but I suspect this repo is getting nuked soon so I'm not blocking over this 😆

Yeah, I did think this too but I think the vast majority of the changes are good enough that it is not worth splitting hairs over. Thanks for taking a look!