Conversation
✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.
💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request updates the package version to 2.6.2 and adds a Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
package.json (1)
58-59:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 MinorConsider alternatives to crypto-js due to discontinuation status.
Both packages verified—no known CVEs for core-js@^3.49.0 or crypto-js@^4.2.0. However, crypto-js has been discontinued and unmaintained since ~2024. While v4.2.0 fixed CVE-2023-46233 and has no current vulnerabilities, the lack of maintenance makes it a maintenance risk. Consider migrating to native Web Crypto API or Node.js crypto module.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@package.json` around lines 58 - 59, Replace the discontinued dependency "crypto-js" with a maintained alternative: refactor code that imports or uses crypto-js to instead use the Node.js "crypto" module (server-side) or the Web Crypto API (browser-side), update all references where "crypto-js" functions/classes are used (e.g., encryption/hash helpers) to call the native APIs, remove "crypto-js" from dependencies in package.json and add any necessary polyfills only if absolutely required, and keep "core-js" unchanged unless you need specific polyfills—test and validate that functions doing hashing/encryption (the modules that currently import "crypto-js") produce identical outputs.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@src/util/campaignRender/webPopup.js`:
- Line 35: The CSS rule in src/util/campaignRender/webPopup.js uses an invalid
value "none" for the color-scheme property; update the declaration in the
webPopup CSS block (the color-scheme property) to a valid value (for example
"light", "dark", "light dark", or remove the property entirely) so it conforms
to the spec and browser behavior.
---
Outside diff comments:
In `@package.json`:
- Around line 58-59: Replace the discontinued dependency "crypto-js" with a
maintained alternative: refactor code that imports or uses crypto-js to instead
use the Node.js "crypto" module (server-side) or the Web Crypto API
(browser-side), update all references where "crypto-js" functions/classes are
used (e.g., encryption/hash helpers) to call the native APIs, remove "crypto-js"
from dependencies in package.json and add any necessary polyfills only if
absolutely required, and keep "core-js" unchanged unless you need specific
polyfills—test and validate that functions doing hashing/encryption (the modules
that currently import "crypto-js") produce identical outputs.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 9a0006e0-3990-408e-b2de-341d9547fbcd
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
CHANGELOG.mdpackage.jsonsrc/util/campaignRender/webPopup.js
Changes
Describe the key changes in this PR with the Jira Issue reference
-Added color scheme for handling background in Adv Builder Web Popup
Changes to Public Facing API if any
Please list the impact on the public facing API if any
How Has This Been Tested?
Describe the testing approach and any relevant configurations (e.g., environment, platform)
Checklist
Link to Deployed SDK
Use these url for testing :
https://static.wizrocket.com/staging/<CURRENT_BRANCH_NAME>/js/clevertap.min.jshttps://static.wizrocket.com/staging/<CURRENT_BRANCH_NAME>/js/sw_webpush.min.jsHow to trigger Automations
Just add a empty commit after all your changes are done in the PR with the command
git commit --allow-empty -m "[run-test] Testing Automation"This will trigger the automation suite
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores