chore: Add consume extensions for ValueEnumerable

[filzrev]

BenchmarkDotNet provider Consume extension methods for IEnumerable/IQueryable.
https://benchmarkdotnet.org/articles/samples/IntroDeferredExecution.html

This PR add Consume extension method for ValueEnumerable.

Other Changes

• Add [Benchmark(Baseline = true)] to show Ratio/AllocRatio column
• Remove some unused code

Benchmark results of LinqSelect4
Following results show original version of LinqSelect4 benchmark results.

Method	Mean	Error	StdDev	Ratio	RatioSD	Allocated	Alloc Ratio
LinqSelect1	2,271.1 us	1,231.48 us	67.50 us	1.00	0.04	50 B	1.00
LinqSelect2	2,319.7 us	252.92 us	13.86 us	1.02	0.03	194 B	3.88
LinqSelect3	5,309.0 us	788.27 us	43.21 us	2.34	0.06	339 B	6.78
LinqSelect4	8,851.8 us	215.24 us	11.80 us	3.90	0.10	486 B	9.72
ZLinqSelect1	548.1 us	92.89 us	5.09 us	1.00	0.01	-	NA
ZLinqSelect2	848.3 us	403.00 us	22.09 us	1.55	0.04	-	NA
ZLinqSelect3	1,114.4 us	141.39 us	7.75 us	2.03	0.02	-	NA
ZLinqSelect4	1,322.1 us	257.35 us	14.11 us	2.41	0.03	-	NA

Benchmark results of LinqSelect4_Consume
Following results show consume version of LinqSelect4 benchmark results.
There is a roughly similar trend.
But ZLinqSelect1 seems slightly slower.

Method	Mean	Error	StdDev	Ratio	RatioSD	Allocated	Alloc Ratio
LinqSelect1	2,306.2 us	1,060.19 us	58.11 us	1.00	0.03	51 B	1.00
LinqSelect2	2,360.9 us	185.45 us	10.16 us	1.02	0.02	194 B	3.80
LinqSelect3	5,374.4 us	958.46 us	52.54 us	2.33	0.05	339 B	6.65
LinqSelect4	8,906.6 us	1,205.41 us	66.07 us	3.86	0.09	486 B	9.53
ZLinqSelect1	817.8 us	62.56 us	3.43 us	1.00	0.01	-	NA
ZLinqSelect2	948.5 us	133.55 us	7.32 us	1.16	0.01	-	NA
ZLinqSelect3	1,194.9 us	332.23 us	18.21 us	1.46	0.02	-	NA
ZLinqSelect4	1,433.6 us	65.81 us	3.61 us	1.75	0.01	-	NA

[neuecc]

Thank you, all of this is helpful (I wasn't familiar with Consume).
With the major rewrite in #56, benchmark results might change significantly.
When I tested locally, Order was still underperforming.
This seems largely because dotnet uses QuickSelect, which even omits part of the sorting process itself.

[neuecc]

implemented QuickSelect; wins completely.