Improve bestiary portrait layout#65
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Daren9m
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 16, 2026 14:05
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Why
The generated assets use a 4:5 portrait composition, but the previous 5:3 thumbnail frame cropped away most of each creature. Image-bearing cards also stretched neighboring text-only cards into large empty panels, while the selected creature panel was too narrow for the artwork.
Impact
Portraits retain their intended framing, the selected artwork is substantially larger, and long stat blocks remain usable through an independent scroll region.
Validation
Full local typecheck remains blocked by unrelated untracked puzzle-engine files with unresolved imports. Those files and the concurrent production image batch are not included in this PR.