Skip to content

Remove the last BindEnv call#52029

Open
hush-hush wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
maxime/remove-last-bindenv
Open

Remove the last BindEnv call#52029
hush-hush wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
maxime/remove-last-bindenv

Conversation

@hush-hush

@hush-hush hush-hush commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What does this PR do?

This adds a default to
"multi_region_failover.remote_configuration.refresh_interval" and "logs_config.api_key" and remove the linter exceptions for settings without types.

Motivation

Describe how you validated your changes

Additional Notes

This adds a default to
"multi_region_failover.remote_configuration.refresh_interval" and
"logs_config.api_key" and remove the linter exceptions for settings
without types.
@hush-hush hush-hush requested review from a team as code owners June 9, 2026 15:43
@hush-hush hush-hush requested a review from rahulkaukuntla June 9, 2026 15:43
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the long review PR is complex, plan time to review it label Jun 9, 2026
@datadog-datadog-prod-us1

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipelines

Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 3 Pipeline jobs failed

DataDog/datadog-agent | oracle: [21.3.0-xe]   View in Datadog   GitLab

Label analysis | release-note-check   View in Datadog   GitHub Actions

Label analysis | skip-qa-check   View in Datadog   GitHub Actions

ℹ️ Info

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 28.74%
Overall Coverage: 50.58% (-0.02%)

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: e33e73c | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor 54ed8217:

Results for datadog-agent_7.81.0~devel.git.619.e33e73c.pipeline.117813742-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor 54ed821
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

Successful checks

Info

Quality gate Change Size (prev → curr → max)
agent_deb_amd64 -24.0 KiB (0.00% reduction, +0.44% of buffer) 752.895 → 752.871 → 758.200
agent_deb_amd64_fips -8.0 KiB (0.00% reduction, +0.66% of buffer) 708.654 → 708.646 → 709.840
agent_heroku_amd64 -8.0 KiB (0.00% reduction, +0.21% of buffer) 311.562 → 311.554 → 315.230
agent_msi -16.5 KiB (0.00% reduction, +0.12% of buffer) 617.083 → 617.067 → 630.600
agent_rpm_amd64 -24.0 KiB (0.00% reduction, +0.44% of buffer) 752.879 → 752.855 → 758.170
agent_rpm_amd64_fips -8.0 KiB (0.00% reduction, +0.65% of buffer) 708.638 → 708.630 → 709.840
agent_rpm_arm64 -16.0 KiB (0.00% reduction, +1.12% of buffer) 728.271 → 728.255 → 729.660
agent_rpm_arm64_fips -12.0 KiB (0.00% reduction, +1.09% of buffer) 687.789 → 687.778 → 688.860
agent_suse_amd64 -24.0 KiB (0.00% reduction, +0.44% of buffer) 752.879 → 752.855 → 758.170
agent_suse_amd64_fips -8.0 KiB (0.00% reduction, +0.65% of buffer) 708.638 → 708.630 → 709.840
agent_suse_arm64 -16.0 KiB (0.00% reduction, +1.12% of buffer) 728.271 → 728.255 → 729.660
agent_suse_arm64_fips -12.0 KiB (0.00% reduction, +1.09% of buffer) 687.789 → 687.778 → 688.860
docker_agent_amd64 -19.99 KiB (0.00% reduction, +1.33% of buffer) 812.319 → 812.300 → 813.790
docker_agent_arm64 -15.99 KiB (0.00% reduction, +0.68% of buffer) 812.744 → 812.728 → 815.030
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 -20.01 KiB (0.00% reduction, +1.52% of buffer) 1003.260 → 1003.241 → 1004.550
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 -16.0 KiB (0.00% reduction, +0.66% of buffer) 992.337 → 992.322 → 994.710
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 -4.0 KiB (0.01% reduction, +5.68% of buffer) 39.841 → 39.837 → 39.910
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 -8.0 KiB (0.03% reduction, +1.21% of buffer) 30.502 → 30.494 → 31.150
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 -4.0 KiB (0.01% reduction, +0.38% of buffer) 28.499 → 28.495 → 29.530
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 -8.0 KiB (0.03% reduction, +1.21% of buffer) 30.502 → 30.494 → 31.150
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 -8.0 KiB (0.03% reduction, +1.21% of buffer) 30.502 → 30.494 → 31.150
12 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
Quality gate Current Size
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 209.753 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 222.847 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 7.447 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 6.877 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 37.946 MiB
docker_host_profiler_amd64 304.525 MiB
docker_host_profiler_arm64 315.638 MiB
iot_agent_deb_amd64 45.671 MiB
iot_agent_deb_arm64 42.389 MiB
iot_agent_deb_armhf 43.184 MiB
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 45.671 MiB
iot_agent_suse_amd64 45.670 MiB

config.BindEnvAndSetDefault("multi_region_failover.failover_apm", false)

config.BindEnv("multi_region_failover.remote_configuration.refresh_interval") //nolint:forbidigo // TODO: replace by 'SetDefaultAndBindEnv'
config.BindEnvAndSetDefault("multi_region_failover.remote_configuration.refresh_interval", time.Duration(0))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see this matches the default for the top-level remote_configuration.refresh_interval that was introduced in #51433 but it strikes me a bit odd as a default since it is lower than the minimum assigned at:

https://github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/blob/main/pkg/config/remote/service/service.go#L448

Maybe the default should be the minumum?

Also, will the switch to IsConfigured effectively disable refresh by default? Is that the correct behavior?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From looking at the comments of IsSet vs IsConfigured, I think you're right, it will go from “use the default refresh interval if present” to “only refresh when the user explicitly configured the interval.”
I'm assuming that's what you're intending based on this change, are you planning on having a refresh interval var somewhere? If you weren't & were planning on just using the default, I would recommend having a real min instead of 0 so you don't get a bunch of warning logs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also in re to the question about default vs min refresh interval, that's on purpose! The 5s minimalRefreshInterval is the absolute lowest duration poll interval the agent is willing to go but the 1min defaultRefreshInterval is the normal poll loop interval that is used at agent startup, so that is our default.
Where defaultRefreshInterval can be overridden statically via configs, or at runtime via backend recommendation

@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 3549b49a-04c5-4f44-b7b6-6ff4c2f13f13

Baseline: 54ed821
Comparison: e33e73c
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.61 [+0.55, +0.66] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.61 [-0.66, -0.57] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization -1.16 [-1.41, -0.91] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -2.16 [-3.20, -1.12] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed observed_value links
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 145.54MiB ≤ 147MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle total_bytes_received 10/10 726.03KiB ≤ 819.20KiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 476.71MiB ≤ 495MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features total_bytes_received 10/10 1.12MiB ≤ 1.25MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 179.09MiB ≤ 195MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 264.37MiB ≤ 292MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 344.66 ≤ 2000 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 396.82MiB ≤ 430MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 0.94GiB ≤ 1.04GiB bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

Replicate Execution Details

We run multiple replicates for each experiment/variant. However, we allow replicates to be automatically retried if there are any failures, up to 8 times, at which point the replicate is marked dead and we are unable to run analysis for the entire experiment. We call each of these attempts at running replicates a replicate execution. This section lists all replicate executions that failed due to the target crashing or being oom killed.

Note: In the below tables we bucket failures by experiment, variant, and failure type. For each of these buckets we list out the replicate indexes that failed with an annotation signifying how many times said replicate failed with the given failure mode. In the below example the baseline variant of the experiment named experiment_with_failures had two replicates that failed by oom kills. Replicate 0, which failed 8 executions, and replicate 1 which failed 6 executions, all with the same failure mode.

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Logs Debug Dashboard
experiment_with_failures baseline 0 (x8) 1 (x6) Oom killed Debug Dashboard

The debug dashboard links will take you to a debugging dashboard specifically designed to investigate replicate execution failures.

❌ Retried Profiling Replicate Execution Failures (ddprof)

Note: Profiling replicas may still be executing. See the debug dashboard for up to date status.

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_logs baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_logs comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants