[ACTP] Add PAR identity rotation commands#52031
Conversation
|
Go Package Import DifferencesBaseline: 2e9ccff
|
4465171 to
71b7905
Compare
Files inventory check summaryFile checks results against ancestor 2e9ccff8: Results for datadog-agent_7.81.0~devel.git.645.e68d033.pipeline.117902013-1_amd64.deb:No change detected |
Static quality checks✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates Successful checksInfo
21 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
|
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 2e9ccff Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory utilization | +0.27 | [+0.01, +0.53] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.27 | [+0.21, +0.33] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | +0.02 | [-0.01, +0.06] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | -2.37 | [-3.44, -1.31] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | observed_value | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | 3 ≤ 4 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | 145.14MiB ≤ 147MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | total_bytes_received | 10/10 | 731.18KiB ≤ 819.20KiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | 3 ≤ 4 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | 477.89MiB ≤ 495MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | total_bytes_received | 10/10 | 1.12MiB ≤ 1.25MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | 4 ≤ 6 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | 180.12MiB ≤ 195MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | total_bytes_received | 10/10 | 264.35MiB ≤ 292MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | cpu_usage | 10/10 | 336.92 ≤ 2000 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | 3 ≤ 6 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | 402.78MiB ≤ 430MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | total_bytes_received | 10/10 | 0.93GiB ≤ 1.04GiB | bounds checks dashboard |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
Replicate Execution Details
We run multiple replicates for each experiment/variant. However, we allow replicates to be automatically retried if there are any failures, up to 8 times, at which point the replicate is marked dead and we are unable to run analysis for the entire experiment. We call each of these attempts at running replicates a replicate execution. This section lists all replicate executions that failed due to the target crashing or being oom killed.
Note: In the below tables we bucket failures by experiment, variant, and failure type. For each of these buckets we list out the replicate indexes that failed with an annotation signifying how many times said replicate failed with the given failure mode. In the below example the baseline variant of the experiment named experiment_with_failures had two replicates that failed by oom kills. Replicate 0, which failed 8 executions, and replicate 1 which failed 6 executions, all with the same failure mode.
| Experiment | Variant | Replicates | Failure | Logs | Debug Dashboard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| experiment_with_failures | baseline | 0 (x8) 1 (x6) | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
The debug dashboard links will take you to a debugging dashboard specifically designed to investigate replicate execution failures.
❌ Retried Profiling Replicate Execution Failures (ddprof)
Note: Profiling replicas may still be executing. See the debug dashboard for up to date status.
| Experiment | Variant | Replicates | Failure | Debug Dashboard |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| quality_gate_idle_all_features | baseline | 10 | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
| quality_gate_idle_all_features | comparison | 10 | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
| quality_gate_logs | baseline | 10 | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
| quality_gate_logs | comparison | 10 | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
| quality_gate_metrics_logs | baseline | 10 | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
| quality_gate_metrics_logs | comparison | 10 | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
71b7905 to
e68d033
Compare
What does this PR do?
Stacked on #52028.
Adds two new subcommands for rotating the Private Action Runner (PAR) identity:
datadog-private-action-runner rotate-identitygenerates fresh ECDSA credentials, calls the enrollment API, and overwrites the stored identity. It prints a reminder to restart PAR to apply the new identity.datadog-cluster-agent rotate-par-identityuses the same enrollment flow, but writes the new identity to the shared Kubernetes secret. Running cluster agent replicas detect the change and hot-reload their PAR identity automatically, with no process restart required.This PR also:
RotateIdentity, which persists an explicitly rotated identity without the normal leader-election gate.keysManager.Startidempotent so hot-reloaded runners can reuse the same key manager without duplicate Remote Config subscriptions.Motivation
Operators need a way to rotate PAR credentials without redeploying.
For standalone PAR, writing the new identity and asking for a restart is enough. For cluster agent deployments with multiple replicas sharing a single K8s Secret, a simple CLI overwrite would leave running replicas holding stale credentials. The hot-reload path ensures all replicas converge on the new identity without downtime.
Describe how you validated your changes
Tested by running:
/opt/datadog-agent/embedded/bin/privateactionrunner rotate-identityfrom inside a Docker image./opt/datadog-agent/bin/datadog-cluster-agent rotate-par-identityfrom inside a cluster agent.Additional Notes
This PR is stacked on #52028 and should be reviewed after the prepare PR.
The
rotate-identitycommand on the PAR binary does not check for a running process. It just writes the new identity and prints a restart reminder. This keeps the command simple and avoids false positives from process detection.RotateIdentitybypasses the leader election check intentionally. It is meant to be called as a one-shot CLI command, not from within the normal replica lifecycle.PARIdentitySecretInformerFactoryis only initialized when bothprivate_action_runner.enabledandprivate_action_runner.identity_use_k8s_secretare true, so there is no overhead for deployments that do not use PAR identity Secret storage.