Skip to content

[automated] Update golang.org/x/... dependencies#52053

Open
dd-octo-sts[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
update-golang-org-x-27259999205-1
Open

[automated] Update golang.org/x/... dependencies#52053
dd-octo-sts[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
update-golang-org-x-27259999205-1

Conversation

@dd-octo-sts

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Update all `golang.org/x/...` dependencies.

Motivation

Keep dependencies up-to-date, benefit from bug fixes and new features.

Describe how you validated your changes

CI is considered enough to validate changes.

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot requested a review from a team as a code owner June 10, 2026 07:28
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/agent-runtimes labels Jun 10, 2026
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot requested review from a team and jeremy-hanna June 10, 2026 07:28
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added the internal Identify a non-fork PR label Jun 10, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the long review PR is complex, plan time to review it label Jun 10, 2026
@datadog-prod-us1-4

datadog-prod-us1-4 Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipelines

Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 3 Pipeline jobs failed

DataDog/datadog-agent | new-e2e-cws-windows   View in Datadog   GitLab

DataDog/datadog-agent | oracle: [21.3.0-xe]   View in Datadog   GitLab

DataDog/datadog-agent | static_quality_gates   View in Datadog   GitLab

ℹ️ Info

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 100.00%
Overall Coverage: 50.61% (-0.01%)

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 838a36f | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor 4978fa0e:

Results for datadog-agent_7.81.0~devel.git.648.838a36f.pipeline.117890601-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Static quality checks

❌ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor 4978fa0
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

Error

Quality gate Change Size (prev → curr → max)
docker_host_profiler_arm64 (per-PR threshold) +604.87 KiB (0.19% increase, -4.45% of buffer) 315.639 → 316.230 → 328.900
Gate failure full details
Quality gate Error type Error message
docker_host_profiler_arm64 PerPRThresholdExceeded On-disk size increase of 604.87 KiB exceeds the per-PR threshold of 600.0 KiB

Static quality gates prevent the PR to merge!
You can check the static quality gates confluence page for guidance. We also have a toolbox page available to list tools useful to debug the size increase.
Please either fix the size violation or request an exception.

Successful checks

Info

Quality gate Change Size (prev → curr → max)
agent_deb_amd64 +229.94 KiB (0.03% increase, -3.62% of buffer) 751.990 → 752.214 → 758.200
agent_deb_amd64_fips +225.94 KiB (0.03% increase, -10.51% of buffer) 707.741 → 707.962 → 709.840
agent_heroku_amd64 +12.06 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.25% of buffer) 310.599 → 310.611 → 315.230
agent_msi +12.0 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.09% of buffer) 617.493 → 617.505 → 630.600
agent_rpm_amd64 +229.94 KiB (0.03% increase, -3.62% of buffer) 751.974 → 752.198 → 758.170
agent_rpm_amd64_fips +225.94 KiB (0.03% increase, -10.43% of buffer) 707.725 → 707.946 → 709.840
agent_rpm_arm64 +233.94 KiB (0.03% increase, -10.19% of buffer) 727.419 → 727.647 → 729.660
agent_rpm_arm64_fips +233.94 KiB (0.03% increase, -11.53% of buffer) 686.879 → 687.107 → 688.860
agent_suse_amd64 +229.94 KiB (0.03% increase, -3.62% of buffer) 751.974 → 752.198 → 758.170
agent_suse_amd64_fips +225.94 KiB (0.03% increase, -10.43% of buffer) 707.725 → 707.946 → 709.840
agent_suse_arm64 +233.94 KiB (0.03% increase, -10.19% of buffer) 727.419 → 727.647 → 729.660
agent_suse_arm64_fips +233.94 KiB (0.03% increase, -11.53% of buffer) 686.879 → 687.107 → 688.860
docker_agent_amd64 +229.94 KiB (0.03% increase, -9.45% of buffer) 811.414 → 811.639 → 813.790
docker_agent_arm64 +233.94 KiB (0.03% increase, -7.14% of buffer) 811.829 → 812.058 → 815.030
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 +229.94 KiB (0.02% increase, -10.23% of buffer) 1002.355 → 1002.580 → 1004.550
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 +233.93 KiB (0.02% increase, -6.95% of buffer) 991.423 → 991.651 → 994.710
docker_host_profiler_amd64 +554.21 KiB (0.18% increase, -4.13% of buffer) 304.526 → 305.068 → 317.640
15 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
Quality gate Current Size
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 209.761 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 222.847 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 7.447 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 6.877 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 39.845 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 37.946 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 30.506 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 28.502 MiB
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 30.506 MiB
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 30.506 MiB
iot_agent_deb_amd64 45.762 MiB
iot_agent_deb_arm64 42.480 MiB
iot_agent_deb_armhf 43.274 MiB
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 45.762 MiB
iot_agent_suse_amd64 45.761 MiB

@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: d4343823-9ed8-4140-bf67-6d3d1e72176b

Baseline: 89977ff
Comparison: 838a36f
Diff

❌ Experiments with retried target crashes

This is a critical error. One or more replicates failed with a non-zero exit code. These replicates may have been retried. See Replicate Execution Details for more information.

  • quality_gate_idle

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +1.96 [+0.89, +3.03] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.43 [+0.38, +0.48] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.31 [-0.35, -0.27] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization -1.41 [-1.67, -1.15] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed observed_value links
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 145.07MiB ≤ 147MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle total_bytes_received 10/10 733.03KiB ≤ 819.20KiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 482.56MiB ≤ 495MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features total_bytes_received 10/10 1.13MiB ≤ 1.25MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 178.27MiB ≤ 195MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 264.37MiB ≤ 292MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 338.14 ≤ 2000 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 402.55MiB ≤ 430MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 0.93GiB ≤ 1.04GiB bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

Replicate Execution Details

We run multiple replicates for each experiment/variant. However, we allow replicates to be automatically retried if there are any failures, up to 8 times, at which point the replicate is marked dead and we are unable to run analysis for the entire experiment. We call each of these attempts at running replicates a replicate execution. This section lists all replicate executions that failed due to the target crashing or being oom killed.

Note: In the below tables we bucket failures by experiment, variant, and failure type. For each of these buckets we list out the replicate indexes that failed with an annotation signifying how many times said replicate failed with the given failure mode. In the below example the baseline variant of the experiment named experiment_with_failures had two replicates that failed by oom kills. Replicate 0, which failed 8 executions, and replicate 1 which failed 6 executions, all with the same failure mode.

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Logs Debug Dashboard
experiment_with_failures baseline 0 (x8) 1 (x6) Oom killed Debug Dashboard

The debug dashboard links will take you to a debugging dashboard specifically designed to investigate replicate execution failures.

❌ Retried Normal Replicate Execution Failures (non-profiling)

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle comparison 3 Oom killed Debug Dashboard

❌ Retried Profiling Replicate Execution Failures (ddprof)

Note: Profiling replicas may still be executing. See the debug dashboard for up to date status.

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_logs baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_logs comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@pgimalac

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Size increase is due to https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/arch/+/762640 (supporting AVX instructions in golang.org/x/arch)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed component/system-probe internal Identify a non-fork PR long review PR is complex, plan time to review it qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/agent-runtimes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants