Skip to content

Update prox-grad backtracking condition#606

Merged
kellertuer merged 29 commits into
masterfrom
hajg-ijk/backtracking-warm-start
May 20, 2026
Merged

Update prox-grad backtracking condition#606
kellertuer merged 29 commits into
masterfrom
hajg-ijk/backtracking-warm-start

Conversation

@hajg-ijk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The :convex backtracking strategy for proximal_gradient_method now entails a slightly different condition whenever the upper bound on the sectional curvature of the manifold, input via the k_max kwarg, is positive. This comes with a "tolerance" type parameter, δ, which must be positive.

hajg-ijk and others added 27 commits July 10, 2025 10:29
Co-authored-by: Ronny Bergmann <git@ronnybergmann.net>
Co-authored-by: Ronny Bergmann <git@ronnybergmann.net>
# Conflicts:
#	Changelog.md
#	src/plans/proximal_gradient_plan.jl
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ronny Bergmann <git@ronnybergmann.net>
@codecov

codecov Bot commented May 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (0e92b74) to head (2868f2e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #606   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           91        91           
  Lines        10052     10054    +2     
=========================================
+ Hits         10052     10054    +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@kellertuer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Is this breaking existing behaviour? Then it should probably be part of the forthcoming 0.6 release?

Besides that one of your stopping criteria is now not code cov'ed on 2 lines, StopWhenGradientMappingNormLess never reaches the point where it reports true.

@hajg-ijk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Is this breaking existing behaviour? Then it should probably be part of the forthcoming 0.6 release?

Besides that one of your stopping criteria is now not code cov'ed on 2 lines, StopWhenGradientMappingNormLess never reaches the point where it reports true.

I don't think this is breaking. But I am a bit puzzled by those 2 missing lines. Will try to cover them.

@kellertuer
kellertuer merged commit df030e4 into master May 20, 2026
13 of 16 checks passed
@kellertuer
kellertuer deleted the hajg-ijk/backtracking-warm-start branch June 26, 2026 15:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants