Skip to content

Fix stale project_id reference in deerflow-tenki README - #25

Merged
GuzmanPintos merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hayssem/claude/deerflow-tenki-scope-note-2li25c
Aug 21, 2026
Merged

Fix stale project_id reference in deerflow-tenki README#25
GuzmanPintos merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hayssem/claude/deerflow-tenki-scope-note-2li25c

Conversation

@hveluxor

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • examples/deerflow-tenki/README.md had a stale "Scope" note referencing project_id, left over from before Tenki removed the account-level project layer.
  • project_id no longer exists in the Tenki API/SDK — every other example in the cookbook already resolves sandboxes purely by workspace_id, and this example's own verify.py only ever sets workspace_id.
  • Updated the note so it only talks about workspace resolution, matching the rest of the codebase.

Test plan

  • Docs-only change; no code or tests affected.
  • Confirmed project_id no longer appears anywhere else in the repo.

Generated by Claude Code

@tenki-reviewer

tenki-reviewer Bot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review complete. No issues found — approved ✅.


This PR updates the deerflow-tenki example README to correct the sandbox scope documentation. The previous text claimed the provider auto-resolves a project when the account has exactly one workspace and one project; the corrected text reflects that only the workspace is auto-resolved (when exactly one exists) and instructs users to set workspace_id explicitly otherwise. The change is documentation-only with no code impact.

Files Change
examples/deerflow-tenki/README.md Corrects the Scope paragraph to remove the project auto-resolution claim and the project_id guidance, aligning the docs with the provider's actual behavior.

Reviewed commit: 7bf849f

@hveluxor hveluxor self-assigned this Aug 19, 2026
@GuzmanPintos
GuzmanPintos merged commit e7c6895 into main Aug 21, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants