Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 10, 2024. It is now read-only.

🚨 [security] Update eslint 7.32.0 → 8.57.0 (major) - #300

Open
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
depfu/update/npm/eslint-8.57.0
Open

🚨 [security] Update eslint 7.32.0 → 8.57.0 (major)#300
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
depfu/update/npm/eslint-8.57.0

Conversation

@depfu

@depfu depfu Bot commented Mar 1, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚨 Your current dependencies have known security vulnerabilities 🚨

This dependency update fixes known security vulnerabilities. Please see the details below and assess their impact carefully. We recommend to merge and deploy this as soon as possible!

Here is everything you need to know about this upgrade. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ eslint (7.32.0 → 8.57.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ @​eslint/eslintrc (indirect, 0.4.3 → 2.1.4) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ ansi-regex (indirect, 5.0.0 → 5.0.1) · Repo

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in chalk/ansi-regex

ansi-regex is vulnerable to Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity

Release Notes

5.0.1

Fixes (backport of 6.0.1 to v5)

This is a backport of the minor ReDos vulnerability in ansi-regex@<6.0.1, as requested in #38.

  • Fix ReDoS in certain cases (#37)
    You are only really affected if you run the regex on untrusted user input in a server context, which it's very unlikely anyone is doing, since this regex is mainly used in command-line tools.

CVE-2021-3807

https://github.com/chalk/ansi-regex/compare/v5.0.0..v5.0.1

Thank you @yetingli for the patch and reproduction case!

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 5 commits:

↗️ confusing-browser-globals (indirect, 1.0.10 → 1.0.11) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

1.0.11

1.0.11 (2017-08-09)

🐛 Bug Fix

  • create-react-app

    • #2884 Improve offline heuristic for proxied environments. (@bsyk)

      When a Yarn proxy is set, we will check its connectivity if we cannot reach Yarn's registry. This is often the case when DNS lookups must be made through the proxy.

    • #2853 Allow use of scoped packages with a pinned version. (@wileybenet)

  • react-dev-utils

    • #2796 Properly escape HTML tags in error overlay. (@ccloli)

      Elements printed in their entirety would sometimes render as HTML. This should no longer happen and should properly render as text.

  • react-dev-utils, react-scripts

  • react-scripts

💅 Enhancement

  • react-scripts

    • #2818 Allow sourcemaps to be disabled. (@viankakrisna)

      As applications grow more complex, it is possible webpack may run out of memory while generating source maps. They may now be disabled by setting GENERATE_SOURCEMAP=false.

    • #2913 Allow flags to be passed to node when running react-scripts. (@koistya)

    • #2574 Upgrade to webpack@3. (@themre)

    • #2747 Simplify webpack configuration using Rule.oneOf. (@Furizaa)

  • react-dev-utils, react-scripts
  • create-react-app
    • #2785 Change error wording and list conflicting files when initializing app. (@OwenFlood)
  • react-dev-utils
  • eslint-config-react-app, react-scripts
  • eslint-config-react-app

📝 Documentation

🏠 Internal

  • create-react-app, eslint-config-react-app, react-dev-utils, react-error-overlay, react-scripts
  • eslint-config-react-app
  • Other
  • react-scripts

Committers: 26

Migrating from 1.0.10 to 1.0.11

Inside any created project that has not been ejected, run:

npm install --save --save-exact react-scripts@1.0.11

or

yarn add --exact react-scripts@1.0.11

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 39 commits:

↗️ debug (indirect, 4.3.1 → 4.3.4) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

4.3.4

What's Changed

  • Add section about configuring JS console to show debug messages by @gitname in #866
  • Replace deprecated String.prototype.substr() by @CommanderRoot in #876

New Contributors

Full Changelog: 4.3.3...4.3.4

4.3.3

Patch Release 4.3.3

This is a documentation-only release. Further, the repository was transferred. Please see notes below.

Thank you to @taylor1791 and @kristofkalocsai for their contributions.

Repository Migration Information

I've formatted this as a FAQ, please feel free to open an issue for any additional question and I'll add the response here.

Q: What impact will this have on me?

In most cases, you shouldn't notice any change.

The only exception I can think of is if you pull code directly from https://github.com/visionmedia/debug, e.g. via a "debug": "visionmedia/debug"-type version entry in your package.json - in which case, you should still be fine due to the automatic redirection Github sets up, but you should also update any references as soon as possible.

Q: What are the security implications of this change?

If you pull code directly from the old URL, you should update the URL to https://github.com/debug-js/debug as soon as possible. The old organization has many approved owners and thus a new repository could (in theory) be created at the old URL, circumventing Github's automatic redirect that is in place now and serving malicious code. I (@Qix-) also wouldn't have access to that repository, so while I don't think it would happen, it's still something to consider.

Even in such a case, however, the officially released package on npm (debug) would not be affected. That package is still very much under control (even more than it used to be).

Q: What should I do if I encounter an issue related to the migration?

Search the issues first to see if someone has already reported it, and then open a new issue if someone has not.

Q: Why was this done as a 'patch' release? Isn't this breaking?

No, it shouldn't be breaking. The package on npm shouldn't be affected (aside from this patch release) and any references to the old repository should automatically redirect.

Thus, according to all of the "APIs" (loosely put) involved, nothing should have broken.

I understand there are a lot of edge cases so please open issues as needed so I can assist in any way necessary.

Q: Why was the repository transferred?

I'll just list them off in no particular order.

  • The old organization was defunct and abandoned.
  • I was not an owner of the old organization and thus could not ban the non-trivial amount of spam users or the few truly abusive users from the org. This hindered my ability to properly maintain this package.
  • The debug ecosystem intends to grow beyond a single package, and since new packages could not be created in the old org (nor did it make sense for them to live there), a new org made the most sense - especially from a security point of view.
  • The old org has way, way too many approved members with push access, for which there was nothing I could do. This presented a pretty sizable security risk given that many packages in recent years have fallen victim to backdoors and the like due to lax security access.

Q: Was this approved?

Yes.[archive]

Q: Do I need to worry about another migration sometime in the future?

No.

4.3.2

Patch release 4.3.2

  • Caches enabled statuses on a per-logger basis to speed up .enabled checks (#799)

Thank you @omg!

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 10 commits:

↗️ espree (indirect, 7.3.1 → 9.6.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ esquery (indirect, 1.4.0 → 1.5.0) · Repo

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 23 commits:

↗️ globals (indirect, 13.10.0 → 13.24.0) · Repo

Release Notes

Too many releases to show here. View the full release notes.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 32 commits:

↗️ ignore (indirect, 4.0.6 → 5.3.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

5.3.0

5.3.0

  • MINOR export Options interface (#105)

An upgrade is safe for all dependents

It allows typing external methods which expect Options as a param, by importing the Options interface.

import {Options} from 'ignore'

5.2.4

  • PATCH fixes normal single asterisk and normal consecutive asterisks defined in gitignore spec (#57)
  • PATCH invalid trailing backslash will not throw unexpectedly

An upgrade is recommended for all dependents

The following rules could be not properly parsed with previous ignore versions

**foo
*bar
qu*ux
abc\   # `ignore` would throw if no whitespace after `\`

5.2.0

  • PATCH support readonly arrays of typescript. (#70)
  • MINOR bring backward compatibility with relative paths. (#75)

An upgrade is recommended for all dependents.

ignore().ignores('../foo/bar.js') // will throw

And the code below will not throw, however it is not recommended

ignore({
  allowRelativePaths: true
}).ignores('../foo/bar.js')

Recommend:

ignore().ignores('foo/bar.js')

5.1.9

  • PATCH fixes ignorecase when internal cache is hit. (#74)

An upgrade is recommended for all dependents.

5.1.5

  • PATCH fixes escaping for square brackets (#59)

An upgrade is recommended for all dependents.

5.1.1

  • PATCH fixes isPathValid on Windows (#54)

On Windows, if path is an absolute path, ig.ignores(path), ig.test(path) and related methods will now throw an error as expected.

5.1.0

  • FEATURE: Typescript: export interface Ignore (#53)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ is-glob (indirect, 4.0.1 → 4.0.3) · Repo

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 8 commits:

↗️ minimatch (indirect, 3.0.4 → 3.1.2) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 minimatch ReDoS vulnerability

A vulnerability was found in the minimatch package. This flaw allows a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when calling the braceExpand function with specific arguments, resulting in a Denial of Service.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 17 commits:

↗️ optionator (indirect, 0.9.1 → 0.9.3) · Repo · Changelog

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 16 commits:

↗️ strip-ansi (indirect, 6.0.0 → 6.0.1) · Repo

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 1 commit:

🆕 @​aashutoshrathi/word-wrap (added, 1.2.6)

🆕 @​eslint-community/eslint-utils (added, 4.4.0)

🆕 @​eslint-community/regexpp (added, 4.10.0)

🆕 @​eslint/js (added, 8.57.0)

🆕 @​humanwhocodes/module-importer (added, 1.0.1)

🆕 @​ungap/structured-clone (added, 1.2.0)

🆕 graphemer (added, 1.4.0)

🆕 is-path-inside (added, 3.0.3)

🆕 yocto-queue (added, 0.1.0)

🗑️ ansi-colors (removed)

🗑️ astral-regex (removed)

🗑️ enquirer (removed)

🗑️ eslint-config-airbnb-base (removed)

🗑️ eslint-utils (removed)

🗑️ lodash.clonedeep (removed)

🗑️ lodash.truncate (removed)

🗑️ progress (removed)

🗑️ require-from-string (removed)

🗑️ slice-ansi (removed)

🗑️ table (removed)

🗑️ v8-compile-cache (removed)

Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu
depfu Bot requested review from adongare and jkotanchik-SB as code owners March 1, 2024 22:11
@depfu depfu Bot added the depfu label Mar 1, 2024
@depfu depfu Bot mentioned this pull request Mar 1, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

@adongare adongare Awaiting requested review from adongare adongare is a code owner
@jkotanchik-SB jkotanchik-SB Awaiting requested review from jkotanchik-SB jkotanchik-SB is a code owner

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

depfu

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants