Mpifort makefile - #251
Conversation
|
Matt Shin (@matthewrmshin) can you test that this branch does what you want it to? I've tested it locally and it seems to work as expected. |
|
Andrew Coughtrie (@andrewcoughtrie) Thanks. David Davies (@DJDavies2) Pleasse have a look at this branch and see if it solves the mpifort problem raised at MetOffice/mo-bundle#859. I'll do some separate tests in my environment as well. |
| type(field_type), intent(in) :: panel_id | ||
| type(field_type), optional, intent(in) :: alt_coords(:,:) | ||
| type(field_type), optional, intent(in) :: alt_panel_ids(:) | ||
| type(field_type), optional, intent(in) :: panel_ids(:) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm getting a failure due to this line. Compiler says this is not a dummy variable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes sorry my fault I seem to have managed to pull in other stuff rather than branching from where I should.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've reverted the erroneous commits so there is only the change I actually intended.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks. I'll re-test now.
Co-authored-by: Mike Hobson <26921912+mike-hobson@users.noreply.github.com>
Ed Hone (EdHone)
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implementation is fine - worth documenting for future build system development with fab
PR Summary
Creating a duplicate of
mpif90.mkfor the more modernmpifort.mk, this is only a short term solution to allow JEDI to use the more modern mpifort, this should also be considered when creating the fab build system.Sci/Tech Reviewer: Mike Hobson (@mike-hobson)
Code Reviewer: Ed Hone (@EdHone)
closes #245
Code Quality Checklist
Testing
Test Suite Results - lfric_core - PR251/run1
Suite Information
Task Information
✅ succeeded tasks - 372
Security Considerations
Performance Impact
AI Assistance and Attribution
Documentation
PSyclone Approval
Sci/Tech Review
(Please alert the code reviewer via a tag when you have approved the SR)
Code Review