release_0.1.11

[codewithgun]

No description provided.

[0xSoju2]

Vault review note (severity: Medium)

Potential transfer-fee accounting divergence in claim_protocol_fee2:

• In programs/dynamic-bonding-curve/src/instructions/operator/ix_claim_protocol_fee2.rs, amount is deducted from protocol-fee state, then transferred with transfer_checked via transfer_token_from_pool_authority.
• Unlike cp-amm, this path does not pre-check transfer-fee-excluded amount for Token-2022 transfer-fee mints.

Why it matters:

• On edge amounts, protocol state can account a claim amount while receiver net amount can be effectively zero/non-intuitive under transfer-fee mechanics.

Suggested fix:

1. compute transfer-fee-excluded amount from selected mint + amount,
2. require excluded amount > 0,
3. then proceed with transfer.

This keeps claim semantics aligned with cp-amm and avoids zero-net-transfer edge cases.