treewide: remove all-packages.nix overrides of packages defined in by-name (A-C)#469771
Conversation
hatch01
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
clang-uml lgtm
nixpkgs-review result
Generated using nixpkgs-review-gha
Command: nixpkgs-review pr 469771
Commit: 43e8e2fbb56115d162139db1c8c9f4f804e7adfc (subsequent changes)
Merge: e85dc98d5bf18046167199c67d08d110f64372fe
Logs: https://github.com/hatch01/nixpkgs-review-gha/actions/runs/20172604460
x86_64-linux
✅ No rebuilds
aarch64-linux
✅ No rebuilds
x86_64-darwin
✅ No rebuilds
aarch64-darwin
✅ No rebuilds
5908d9c to
d0b5281
Compare
|
Rebased (although there were no conflicts, at least locally...). @Aleksanaa given that it's been 2 weeks without objections (and with multiple approvals), do you think this can be merged/would you be willing to dismiss your review? |
|
@mdaniels5757 did you look at my review comment, I didn't see a reply. |
|
@deftdawg I don't see a review comment from you. What was it/are you sure you submitted it? |
|
It was in pending... I guess you couldn't see it then... sorry about that. |
d0b5281 to
b63f34d
Compare
bumping :) |
|
🎉 |
This is a step towards resurrecting #454525.
(I did not use the work already done in #453948 for this, unfortunately, as I noticed the link when preparing this PR... Oh well.)
Should be 0 rebuilds.
Things done
passthru.tests.nixpkgs-reviewon this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage../result/bin/.Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.