feat: add ASCON sponsorship proposal slides (12 slides) - #19
Open
grandchildrice wants to merge 38 commits into
Open
feat: add ASCON sponsorship proposal slides (12 slides)#19grandchildrice wants to merge 38 commits into
grandchildrice wants to merge 38 commits into
Conversation
grandchildrice
commented
Mar 11, 2026
grandchildrice
commented
Contributor
- ASCON: Agentic Simulation for eCONomics competition
- Slides: title, executive summary, background, competition design, team structure, sponsor benefits x2, packages, budget, roadmap, references, closing
- Fix SL04 build error (removed invalid closing div tags)
- Add slides/ directory with SL01-SL12.md
- Update slides.md title and reduce to 12 slides only
- ASCON: Agentic Simulation for eCONomics competition - Slides: title, executive summary, background, competition design, team structure, sponsor benefits x2, packages, budget, roadmap, references, closing - Fix SL04 build error (removed invalid closing div tags) - Add slides/ directory with SL01-SL12.md - Update slides.md title and reduce to 12 slides only
Deploying with
|
| Status | Name | Latest Commit | Preview URL | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ Deployment successful! View logs |
presentation-agent | 45453d8 | Commit Preview URL Branch Preview URL |
Jun 22 2026, 03:57 AM |
- Action Title: convert all topic titles to assertive sentence titles - Skim Test: titles now tell a complete story when read in sequence - SCR structure: SL03 follows Situation/Complication/Question/Answer format - 3-Second Test: each slide conveys one clear idea - Bullet points minimized: tables used throughout for clarity - Speaker notes added/updated for all slides - SL09: added note that EF/Dentsu Research are not confirmed
- タイトル・コンセプトを「AIエージェントがテストしてプロトコル改善やセキュリティイシューを発見するテスト用L2 Rollup」に変更 - SL01: カバースライドをV2コンセプト（24/7 Stress Test, OpStack L2）に刷新 - SL02: エグゼクティブサマリーをV2の価値提供（DeFiテスト基盤）に更新 - SL03: 新規追加 — 静的テストから動的・自律的テストへのパラダイムシフトを説明 - SL04: アーキテクチャ図をDeFiプロバイダー→L2→AIエージェントのフローに変更 - SL05: 旧スライド削除（V1コンセプトの重複スライド） - SL10: スポンサーメリットをパラメータ最適化・セキュリティ発見に更新 - SL11: EIP規格テスト・分散型AIホスティング促進の価値を追加 - SL12: スポンサーティアにコントラクトデプロイ優先権を追加 - SL14: Phase詳細にL2基盤構築・EIPフィードバックを追記 - SL15: 参考文献にDeFiセキュリティ事例（Uniswap Bug Bounty等）を追加 - SL16: クロージングをDeFiプロトコルの未来を創る訴求に変更
- SL01: カバーを「AIエージェントが利益を競うDeFiテスト用公共財 L2 Rollup」に変更 - SL02: エグゼクティブサマリーのHowに「コントラクトをデプロイするだけで参加可能」を明記 - SL03: Answerを「コンペを通じた動的テスト環境（公共財）」として再定義 - SL04: アーキテクチャ図のL2を「テスト用公共財」と明記、03を「研究のための公共財」に変更 - SL10: スポンサーメリットの説明に「利益を競うAI」という文脈を追加 - SL11: メリット③を「DeFi研究のための公共財」に変更、④をEIP規格テストに整理 - SL12: タイトルを「DeFiの未来を創る公共財の実現者」に変更
- slides.md: タイトルを「AIエージェントが利益を競うDeFiテスト用コンペ基盤」に変更 - SL01: カバーを「一度構築すれば永続的に拡張できる」コンセプトに刷新、∞ Expandableを追加 - SL02: Howに「コントラクトをデプロイするだけ」、Visionに「永続的に拡張できるテスト基盤」を追記 - SL03: ASCON V2 → ASCONに統一 - SL04: アーキテクチャ図を「Step1: 基盤構築→Step2: 第1回ASCON→Step3+: コントラクト追加」の3ステップ構造に刷新 - SL10〜SL12: ASCON V2 → ASCONに統一 - SL15〜SL16: ASCON V2 → ASCONに統一
- SL04: scale-200を削除、mt/mbをコンパクトに、カードのpaddingとフォントサイズを縮小 - SL15: 1カラム→2カラムレイアウトに変更し全体のはみ出しを解消
Restructured the deck around a clear, fact-first arc: an accessible problem → the solution → the competition → fact-based sponsor value. Problem (two fact-based slides): - SL02b: crypto theft hit $3.4B in 2025, yet the worst attack classes (MEV, oracle manipulation, economic attacks) are explicitly out of scope for bug bounties — and the human audit model is collapsing (curl ended its bounty after AI-slop spam, HackerOne +210% AI reports, Code4rena announced wind-down). - SL02c (new): AI agents are already moving real money (Google AP2, x402; Gartner: $15T B2B by 2028) but there is no safe public arena to test agent-vs-agent behaviour before it touches the real economy. Solution: SL03 is now a full-bleed immersive scene — ASCON, the world's first blockchain for LLMs — using the company-deck city engine ported in as public/city, ethereum variant, with AI-agent inhabitants added: cyan Trader agents walking the avenues, red hooded Hacker agents that lunge at them and rob them. Sponsor value (SL10) rewritten in the same fact style — each pillar leads with a figure (唯一 / 100+ / 1,430 / $3.4B). Cover, executive summary and the sources slide updated to match. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three corrections from review: - Naming: the blockchain L2 is "Eris"; "ASCON" is the recurring competition that feeds it. Renamed every L2/platform reference to Eris across the deck; kept ASCON only where it means the competition. - Agents: Trader, Hacker and Verifier all share one goal — maximising their own profit. Verifier is no longer framed as altruistic "defending"; it earns bounties by finding and proving vulnerabilities. It is the relentless competition between profit-seeking agents that hardens the city. - Sponsor-facing language (SL12-14): dropped internal fundraising framing. SL13 no longer states that platinum money is "all allocated to the prize" — the funding-source mapping and buffer line are removed; it is now a plain, sponsor-facing budget-transparency slide. SL12 drops the "prize allocation" perk; SL14 roadmap reworded (募集→確定) and the stray RWA mention removed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
SL04 (the ASCON competition) was a wall of prose. Rebuilt it around a flywheel diagram — five numbered stages on a dashed ring (hold a competition → implementations gather → Eris hardens → discovery quality rises → industry attention → next round draws more) with the first- competition facts as compact figures beside it. SL10's title no longer talks about "showing value with facts" — it just states it: the four assets a sponsor walks away with. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Brings scripts/refine.sh, refine-step.mjs and the recursive/visual self-improvement prompts over from company-deck so the ascon-proposal deck has the same refine loop available. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Direct polish pass (the autonomous refine loop's slidev-export renderer hangs in this sandbox, so applied by hand): - SL05: crisper title — the EIP testbed framed as a concrete "only place in the world", not "副次機能：…としても機能します". - SL16: closing reframed from "DeFiプロトコルの未来" to the deck's actual thesis — a world where AI agents run the economy safely (Eris + ASCON). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
p2-4 — cut the text, make the eye-flow obvious: - SL02 executive summary: the 7-row table is now a left-to-right flow of three cards — 課題 → Eris(解決) → ASCON(エンジン) — with Eris as the emphasised focal point and a thin Who/Vision/Bonus footer. - SL02b / SL02c: each opens on one huge number ($3.4B / $15T) as the entry point, then a single supporting band, then compact fact cards, then a bold conclusion bar — prose cut to labels. p9-12 — the four separate achievement slides are merged into one (SL07): a 2×2 grid that maps each result onto what it proves for Eris — Hacker AI, Verifier AI, Trader/insight, and the proof-engine core — each with its peer-reviewed venue. SL08/SL09/SL09b removed. SL13 budget: dropped the "we disclose the use of funds" pitch — it is just a plain breakdown now. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- SL02c: rebuilt — the box-salad is gone. A clean left/right contrast
split by a single hairline: left = the reality (the $15T economy is
already here, AP2/x402), right = the gap (no safe place to test it),
carried by type hierarchy and whitespace, not borders.
- SL05: the EIP testbed is now a 4-step flow diagram (new EIP → deploy
on Eris → 100+ agents stress it → instant data), not prose.
- SL07: collapsed to three cards — Trader / Hacker / Verifier — with
theorem-proving folded into Verifier. Each card leads with the role
in plain words and explains the result for non-experts ("DEX" → "an
online exchange anyone can use"). Inline sources added.
- Sources: the standalone sources slide is moved to the very end as an
Appendix (after the closing); every content slide already cites
inline via SourceCite.
- New SL14b: "what the competition produces" — four ongoing research
themes (DeFi design proposals, new security baselines, zero-day
discovery, AI-agent-economy analysis).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every content slide already cites its sources inline via SourceCite, so the standalone appendix list was redundant. Removed it; the deck now ends on the closing slide. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- SL01: dropped the background photo and dark overlay; the cover is now a clean white slide with black serif type, matching the deck. - SL16: added a line break before the contact email so it sits clear of the organisation name. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
SL14b reorganised so the research output is honest about likelihood: - Certain — just holding ASCON yields the security-baseline paper and benchmark from the Hacker×Verifier match data. - Conditional — DeFi design proposals and zero-day write-ups happen if the imbalances / vulnerabilities are actually found. - Future — the AI-agent-economy analysis comes once data accumulates. Three columns, certainty decreasing left to right, the committed deliverable emphasised. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Under the conditional ("発見があり次第") tier of SL14b, added a third
output: an active-cyber-defense dataset. Dynamic, attack-related data is
scarce in the field — Eris, where Hacker AIs attack continuously for
real stakes, can harvest real attack data and publish it as a research
dataset.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The "certain" tier of SL14b gains a second guaranteed output: with many AI implementations and their match results in hand, the competition itself yields research on winning-strategy analysis and on combining strong agents into higher-performance ones — no discovery required. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
# Conflicts: # bun.lock # package.json # prompts/10_Recursive_Self_Improvement.md # prompts/11_Visual_Self_Improvement.md # scripts/refine-step.mjs # scripts/refine.sh
…n-agent into ascon-proposal
Major restructure following slide_revision_proposal_enterprise_web3.md: - New 19-slide flow: Cover → Market → Risks → Eris/ASCON → Why DeFi → 3D City → Flywheel → Operational → Scenario → Who/Submit → Ranking → Outputs → Sponsor Value → Plans → Nyx → Web3 deep-dive → Roadmap → Closing - p3 reframed from "audit market broken" to "4 AI agent risks" - p8 (Operational), p9 (Scenario), p10 (Who/Submit/Win) replaced with Figma-designed UI mockups: live ops console / live mempool with AI-to-AI deception / SDK + submission flow Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Drop "共同実証/共同主催" framing across SL01/SL02/SL10/SL12/SL14b - Add 6 new slides clarifying sponsor scope: Sponsor Model, Deliverables, IP & Data Policy, Data Access, Responsibility Boundary, Cost Boundary - Strategic Partner now reads "許諾済み成果物への限定アクセス" instead of "全提出AI実装へのアクセス"; SL10 replaces 独占一次データ with 公開レポートでは出ない粒度のスポンサー限定分析 - Clarify that participant IP stays with participants; Nyx receives only the license needed for review/replay/research/reporting Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Visual review of exported PNGs found:
- Deliverables, IP & Data Policy, Responsibility Boundary, Cost Boundary
rendered black-on-black header rows because global style.css
`div { color: #000 }` directly targeted child divs and beat the row-level
`.head { color: #fff }`. Fixed by scoping `.head div { color: #fff !important }`.
- Sponsor Model title card wrapped "スポンサーとして参加" with orphan "る";
shortened to fit one line.
- Deliverables table was overflowing its bottom note; tightened row padding
and font sizes so all rows + footer note fit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Why: "フルログ"/"コード共有" overstate sponsor data access vs. the permissioned model; speaker-note residue still said 「AIエージェントコンペ ブランド協賛」 and 「共同主催を求めるものではなく」. - SL12: フルログ → 該当範囲の詳細分析 (table + notes); update old 稟議名 - SL_data_access: コード共有 → 許諾済み実装 - SL_sponsor_model notes: replace "共同主催を求めるものではなく" with positive framing of the sponsor program - SL10 notes: clarify 共同WP ≠ 共同主催/研究共著 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
# Conflicts: # vite.config.ts
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.