Skip to content

schema: add descriptions for flow stats counters - v3#13758

Closed
jufajardini wants to merge 2 commits into
OISF:masterfrom
jufajardini:doc-7794-flow-schema/v3
Closed

schema: add descriptions for flow stats counters - v3#13758
jufajardini wants to merge 2 commits into
OISF:masterfrom
jufajardini:doc-7794-flow-schema/v3

Conversation

@jufajardini

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Task #7794

Redmine ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7794

Previous PR #13753

Describe changes:

  • incorporate feedback rewording some of the counters
  • capitalize a few more descriptions
  • remove typos

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.71%. Comparing base (49629f7) to head (be7352f).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #13758       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   77.16%   83.71%    +6.54%     
===========================================
  Files         945     1011       +66     
  Lines      172228   275066   +102838     
===========================================
+ Hits       132906   230273    +97367     
- Misses      39322    44793     +5471     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 62.91% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️
livemode 19.00% <ø> (ø)
pcap 44.71% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
suricata-verify 65.07% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
unittests 59.18% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@suricata-qa

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline = 27259

Comment thread etc/schema.json
"local_bypassed": {
"type": "integer"
"type": "integer",
"description": "Number of flows bypassed by Suricata at the time of flow end"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bypassed internally?

"at the time of the flow end" is a bit unclear I think. Is the bypass done at the end of the flow, or are we counting at the flow end? (the latter is correct)

@jufajardini

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

followed by #13765

@jufajardini jufajardini deleted the doc-7794-flow-schema/v3 branch September 9, 2025 14:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants