Xdp tunnel 7674 v16#15603
Closed
catenacyber wants to merge 13 commits into
Closed
Conversation
Closed
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #15603 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 82.90% 82.87% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 1006 1007 +1
Lines 273648 273876 +228
==========================================
+ Hits 226869 226987 +118
- Misses 46779 46889 +110
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
WARNING:
Pipeline = 31954 |
for SV to run tests based on the presence of this feature
Completes commit 7e725c6 autofp-scheduler with value ftp-hash ends up using FlowGetIpPairProtoHash which ignores the ports for ftp-looking flows so that the ftp and ftp-data flow get processed by the same thread. As for the other cases, we want to use every other parameter to compute the flow hash, inclusing the live device
So that we know for a packet which precise type of tunnel it is (like erspan2).
Ticket: 7674 To distinguish flows with the same 5-tuple but coming from different configured tunnel sources. For vxlan, we need to call 1. PacketTunnelPktSetup with vxlan header 2. Call a new DecodeVXLANtunnel which - sets the tunnel id - call DecodeEthernet on data after vxlan header as before
Ticket: 7674
Ticket: 7674
Ticket: 7674 On interfaces meant to receive only tunneled traffic
so as to run ebpf live tests
Ticket: 7674 Allows a compile-time option AFPACKET_TEST_REPLAY, that allows to set a configuration max-packets per afpacket interface, after which the PktAcqLoop stops. This allows suricata-verify tests to run with tcpreplay, and know when to stop
catenacyber
force-pushed
the
xdp-tunnel-7674-v16
branch
from
6ec593f to
41bcc02
Compare
|
WARNING:
Pipeline = 32034 |
Closed
Contributor
Author
|
Replaced by #15710 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Link to ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7674
Describe changes:
SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#3045
#15415 with needed rebase
On top of first #15446