[PROOFREADING] wallet_section - zh-Hans

[MilankovicProtocol]

Closes #4263

[Asi0Flammeus]

Hi @MilankovicProtocol, thanks for tackling the entire wallet section in zh-Hans.

I've pushed a small follow-up commit (38197d2) handling what I was confident about:

• 5 regression fixes: Blink Wallet brand restored in 2 headings (blink), Electrum brand restored where the "E" was dropped, 结main → 界面 (sparrow), 就应概览 → 交易概览 (bull-bitcoin), and the "tips that dude" quote semantic restored (electrum)
• finished the 投资组合 → 钱包 sweep (13 files where both terms coexisted)
• finished the 你 → 您 register sweep (12 files; left 你 only in the "Not your keys, not your coins" blockquote in breez)
• normalized 闪电网路 → 闪电网络 (6 zh-Hant stragglers)
• stripped trailing whitespace introduced in 10 files

Before I finalize, a few questions where I'd rather have your call than guess. Based on your answers I'll apply the rest myself — no action needed from you on the code.

Please answer each with intentional / not intentional:

1. Mnemonic terminology — You introduced 助记词 as the canonical form, but 短语, 恢复短语, and 种子 still coexist in 37–40 files. Did you mean 助记词 to replace all of them, or do you keep a distinction (e.g. 种子 for "seed" vs 助记词 for "mnemonic phrase")? If the latter, can you describe the rule so I can apply it consistently?

2. English "Bitcoin" still in the prose of 62 files — You introduced 比特币 widely. Was the remaining English "Bitcoin" intentional (e.g. preserving brand contexts like Bitcoin Core, Bull Bitcoin, Bitcoin Beach), or do you want a global sweep of prose-context "Bitcoin" → 比特币 while keeping multi-word brand names intact?

3. Hardware Wallet → 硬件钱包 — converted in only 4 places; 16 files still use the English form. Intentional, or pending?

4. 计算机 vs 电脑 ("computer") — both forms coexist in 24 files; you converted 7 instances. Should I sweep to one form, and which?

5. 初学者 vs 新手 ("beginner") — same situation; you started a sweep but 28 files still mix both. Preferred form?

6. Quote style — you converted some "…" to "…" and others to backticks for UI labels. Should I normalize to a single style across the section, and which one ("…" curly Chinese quotes, or backticks for UI labels + curly for prose)?

7. muun and liana — both are still 1st-round zh-Hans candidates in tutorials/wallet/ but absent from this PR. Intentional skip, or coming in a follow-up?

Just let me know on each point and I'll handle the cleanup before merging. Thanks!

[MilankovicProtocol]

Hello asi0, sorry for the late reply, here are the clarifications:

1. Intentional. 助记词 = refers to the 12/24 words mnemonic phrase, 种子 = refers to the "seed" in cryptographic terms
2. Intentional. For proper nouns (e.g. brand names) I do not translate the term to Chinese. I only translate Bitcoin to 比特币 when it refers to the bitcoin network/the currency itself
3. Not intentional. "Hardware wallet" terms should be converted to 硬件钱包，sorry for the overlook 🙏
4. Intentional. 计算机 is more formal, while 电脑 is less formal and more used in speech. I wanted to have a variety in the terms. However, if you want to sweep into one form for consistency, you can use 计算机.
5. Intentional. I wanted to have a variety in the terms. If you want to sweep for consistency, I prefer 初学者.
6. Not intentional. UI labels should use back ticks while quotes should use curly chinese quotes. I apologize for the overlook 🙏.
7. Intentional. I have proofread those two wallet tutorials before.

Thank you for pointing these out 🙏