fix(dagster): use block-number-scoped row count for pre-DROP safety c…#53811
Open
fix(dagster): use block-number-scoped row count for pre-DROP safety c…#53811
Conversation
Contributor
|
Contributor
|
🎭 Playwright report · View test results →
These issues are not necessarily caused by your changes. |
matt-metivier
approved these changes
Apr 9, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…heck
Problem
The part breaker's safety check before
DROP PARTcompares the number of attached parts against expected count. ClickHouse background merges can combine freshly attached parts between the ATTACH and the safety check, reducing the count. This causes the safety check to fail with:The INSERT SELECT, ATTACH, and replication all succeed — data is intact — but the overly strict part count check prevents the DROP, leaving the old oversized part waste
Changes
min_block,max_block) of our parts from part namessystem.partsfor parts that overlap our block rangeWhy this is safe:
max_blockupper boundFailure cases:
How did you test this code?
_part-filtered row counts before and after dropping old parmin_block_number/max_block_numberare preserved through merges on prodPublish to changelog?
no