Skip to content

Build gfx125X hotswap stack with PR6346 amd-llvm#6360

Open
ammarwa wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
users/aelwazir/gfx125x-hotswap-pr6346-amdllvm-match
Open

Build gfx125X hotswap stack with PR6346 amd-llvm#6360
ammarwa wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
users/aelwazir/gfx125x-hotswap-pr6346-amdllvm-match

Conversation

@ammarwa

@ammarwa ammarwa commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

This branch captures the current gfx125X hotswap validation combo with the compiler/amd-llvm gitlink corrected to match the PR6346 hotswap chain.

Key source state:

  • TheRock base: 5db05fe
  • compiler/amd-llvm: 4fe37e2ab0cb24b34b135b12f6b93d84394fde7b
  • rocm-systems: 8e1ee991ebea976c5a473624482538f5628af33c
  • rocm-libraries: 4da814d03513e397f1c1d66047b00669673f7ec1

This intentionally preserves the current hotswap combo and only fixes the prior compiler/amd-llvm mismatch against PR6346.

PR7869 Exclusion Gate

The regenerated build must not include ROCm/rocm-systems#7869. The build evidence records this gate:

cd <TheRock source>/rocm-systems
git fetch origin pull/7869/head:refs/remotes/origin/pr-7869-head || true
git merge-base --is-ancestor c12ef1ad8bf9a6ccc6f3fc57de0bda6c7f978887 HEAD && echo BAD_INCLUDED || echo OK_NOT_INCLUDED

Observed result: OK_NOT_INCLUDED.

Build/Validation

A corrected gfx125X runtime tarball and matching tests tarball are being regenerated from this source combo. Publication and dashboard evidence will be attached in the validation handoff once packaging completes.

@ammarwa ammarwa requested a review from a team as a code owner July 6, 2026 15:23
@therock-pr-bot

therock-pr-bot Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

❌ PR Check — Action Required

Check Status Details
🌿 Branch Name ✅ Pass
📝 PR Title/Description ❌ Fail Error: Title does not follow Conventional Commits style.
Expected: start with a valid type (feat, fix, docs, …).
Desired format: type(optional-scope): short description
───
Error: PR description must reference a JIRA ID, ISSUE ID, or a GitHub closing keyword.
Expected: include a JIRA ID / ISSUE ID line (separator : or -, or omitted; value may be a JIRA key, a number with/without #, or a link), OR a closing keyword + issue reference. Accepted examples:
JIRA ID : TESTAUTO-6039
JIRA ID - #330
JIRA ID #330
ISSUE ID : TESTUTO-3334
ISSUE ID #3334
ISSUE ID - TESTAUTO-3433
ISSUE ID : https://github.com/<org_name>/<repo_name>/issues/1234
Closes #10
Fixes octo-org/octo-repo#100
Resolves: #123
#123
https://github.com/<org_name>/<repo_name>/issues/123
Current: no valid JIRA/ISSUE/closing-keyword reference found
Forbidden Files ✅ Pass
🧪 Unit Test ✅ Pass PR does not contain code files — Unit Test auto-passed
🔎 pre-commit ⏳ Pending ⏳ Still running…
🚫 Draft PR 🔜 To Be Enabled
🚩 Feature Flag 🔜 To Be Enabled
📊 Code Coverage 🔜 To Be Enabled

⚠️ 1 policy check(s) failed. Please address the issues above before this PR can be Reviewed.

🚫 Please fix the failed policies

  • ❌ PR Title/Description

The Not ready to Review label was added to this PR. Once all policies pass, the label is removed automatically.

📖 Need help? See the Policy FAQ for details on every check and how to fix failures.

@therock-pr-bot therock-pr-bot Bot added the Not ready to Review PR has unresolved policy failures — reviews blocked label Jul 6, 2026
@therock-pr-bot

therock-pr-bot Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚫 Please fix the failed policies before requesting reviews.

The following policy checks failed:

  • ❌ PR Title/Description

The Not ready to Review label has been added to this PR.
Once all policies pass, the label will be removed automatically.

@schundu007

Copy link
Copy Markdown

❌ PR Gate — Gate failing

Classification: mixed · Labels: Not ready to Review

Category Status Matched check
lint missing no matching check
tests failure Linux::release / Build DEB Packages +28
docs missing no matching check
license missing no matching check

Runner recommendation: gpu 🖥️ GPU — Mixed changes — use GPU runner to be safe

Updated by GitPulse · 2026-07-07 04:32 UTC

@marbre marbre left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This doesn't seem it should target main. What is the purpose of this PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Not ready to Review PR has unresolved policy failures — reviews blocked

Projects

Status: TODO

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants