Changed cell specialisation calculation

[Accidental-Explorer]

Brief Description of What This PR Does

Makes some lighter changes to the cell specialisation calculation:

• Take into account hex size so that a cell using advanced organelles isn't likely to have a lower bonus automatically.
• Exclude the nucleus from the calculation because its large size would have too large an influence due to above change. And realistically, having a nucleus does not really make any cell "less specialised".
• Remove the minimum size required to trigger the specialisation effect. This prevents the sudden jump going from 5 to 6 organelles and makes design of sub-6 hex cells a bit more interesting. I also don't think this has a dangerously big effect, since the bonus rises gradually from 0 anyway.

Tooltip not adjusted yet.

More extensive overhauls:
#6805 B
#6806 C
#6822 D

Related Issues

• Switching to eukaryotic organelles lowers specialisation bonus
• There's an unexpected sudden jump in process speeds when you reach 6 organelles and trigger the specialisation system.

Progress Checklist

Note: before starting this checklist the PR should be marked as non-draft.

• PR author has checked that this PR works as intended and doesn't
  break existing features:
  https://wiki.revolutionarygamesstudio.com/wiki/Testing_Checklist
  (this is important as to not waste the time of Thrive team
  members reviewing this PR)
• Initial code review passed (this and further items should not be checked by the PR author)
• Functionality is confirmed working by another person (see above checklist link)
• Final code review is passed and code conforms to the
  styleguide.

Before merging all CI jobs should finish on this PR without errors, if
there are automatically detected style issues they should be fixed by
the PR author. Merging must follow our
styleguide.

[hhyyrylainen]

Code change looks good to me now, but I won't comment on the gameplay / design side just yet.

[hhyyrylainen]

I suppose this is compatible with #6825 (after fixing the merge conflict). But how necessary is this now?

[Accidental-Explorer]

I suppose this is compatible with #6825 (after fixing the merge conflict). But how necessary is this now?

Still quite useful in my opinion. I don't think it's good that switching to eukaryotic organelles will provide a lower specialisation bonus. The equivalence change helps with the transition, but not the end point. Combined, the two changes completely fix the problem.

Of course, in this PR I also remove the minimum size, but that's separate.

[hhyyrylainen]

Updating this count like this will break the tooltip (just commenting to remember about this as you said you didn't touch the tooltip side yet for this PR) as the tooltip will claim the player has way more organelles than they actually do.

[Accidental-Explorer]

Very true! I was planning to either count the organelles themselves separately for the tooltip, or actually referring to organelle hexes (or size in some way) in the tooltip, since that would also inform the player of what is going on.

That makes me realise that in Master, the tooltip is now already a little bit off because it counts for example thylakoids in the number of chloroplasts. When I work on the tooltip, that's probably worth an "(or simpler equivalent)", or something like that.

[hhyyrylainen]

Not counting the organelle / part tooltips, this is already one of the longest tooltips in the game... so I think we are quickly reaching the point where any player seeing the tooltip will mentally give up before managing to read it.

Edit: just wanted to say why I didn't change it. The advice is still right that you should be adding more of the most common organelle even when it is said to be the eukaryotic equivalent.