Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughTwo new Go solution files are added: one for Challenge 19 with four exported slice utilities ( Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ❌ 3❌ Failed checks (2 warnings, 1 inconclusive)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
challenge-19/submissions/jim3/solution-template.go (2)
10-12: Tighten the empty-slice comment inFindMax.Line 11 says “or another default value”, but this challenge contract expects
0specifically. Consider removing that phrase to avoid ambiguity.
25-41: Optional: preallocate slice/map capacity to reduce reallocations.You can reserve capacity from
len(numbers)inRemoveDuplicatesandFilterEvenfor a small allocation/perf improvement.♻️ Suggested diff
func RemoveDuplicates(numbers []int) []int { if len(numbers) == 0 { return []int{} } - result := []int{} - seen := make(map[int]bool) + result := make([]int, 0, len(numbers)) + seen := make(map[int]bool, len(numbers)) @@ func FilterEven(numbers []int) []int { - result := make([]int, 0) + result := make([]int, 0, len(numbers))Also applies to: 56-66
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 9ec79f85-6605-4dda-9d31-bdea65d9cfa8
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
challenge-19/submissions/jim3/solution-template.go
No description provided.