[Enhancement] Expression-driven on-demand lazy column loading for parquet scanner by dirtysalt · Pull Request #74886 · StarRocks/starrocks

dirtysalt · 2026-06-16T07:58:30Z

Why I'm doing:

For multi-branch OR queries with count(*), StarRocks reads far more IO than Trino:

SELECT count(*) FROM iceberg.zya.lineitem_latemat WHERE
   (l_shipdate BETWEEN '1998-01-01' AND '1998-01-31' AND (l_discount       > 0.09                 OR l_tax             > 0.07))
OR (l_shipdate BETWEEN '1997-11-01' AND '1997-11-30' AND (l_quantity       < 10                   OR l_extendedprice   > 90000))
OR (l_shipdate BETWEEN '1997-09-01' AND '1997-09-30' AND (l_returnflag     = 'R'                  OR l_linestatus      = 'O'))
OR (l_shipdate BETWEEN '1997-07-01' AND '1997-07-31' AND (l_shipmode       = 'AIR'                OR l_comment         LIKE '%URGENT%'))
OR (l_shipdate BETWEEN '1997-05-01' AND '1997-05-31' AND (l_shipinstruct   = 'DELIVER IN PERSON'  OR l_partkey         < 50000))
OR (l_shipdate BETWEEN '1997-03-01' AND '1997-03-31' AND (l_commitdate     > '1998-06-01'         OR l_receiptdate     > '1998-06-01'))
OR (l_shipdate BETWEEN '1997-01-01' AND '1997-01-31' AND (l_discount       < 0.02                 OR l_extendedprice   < 5000))
OR (l_shipdate BETWEEN '1996-11-01' AND '1996-11-30' AND (l_quantity       > 45                   OR l_suppkey         < 10000))
OR (l_shipdate BETWEEN '1996-09-01' AND '1996-09-30' AND (l_shipmode       = 'SHIP'               OR l_linestatus      = 'F'))
OR (l_shipdate BETWEEN '1996-07-01' AND '1996-07-31' AND (l_tax            < 0.01                 OR l_comment         LIKE '%SPECIAL%'));


CREATE TABLE iceberg.zya.lineitem_latemat
(
    l_orderkey      BIGINT,
    l_partkey       BIGINT,
    l_suppkey       BIGINT,
    l_linenumber    INT,
    l_quantity      DECIMAL(15,2),
    l_extendedprice DECIMAL(15,2),
    l_discount      DECIMAL(15,2),
    l_tax           DECIMAL(15,2),
    l_returnflag    STRING,
    l_linestatus    STRING,
    l_shipdate      DATE,
    l_commitdate    DATE,
    l_receiptdate   DATE,
    l_shipinstruct  STRING,
    l_shipmode      STRING,
    l_comment       STRING
)
USING iceberg
PARTITIONED BY (bucket(128, l_orderkey))
TBLPROPERTIES (
      'format-version' = '3',
    'write.parquet.compression-codec' = 'zstd',
    'write.target-file-size-bytes' = '134217728'
);

INSERT INTO iceberg.zya.lineitem_latemat
SELECT
    l_orderkey, l_partkey, l_suppkey, l_linenumber,
    l_quantity, l_extendedprice, l_discount, l_tax,
    l_returnflag, l_linestatus,
    l_shipdate, l_commitdate, l_receiptdate,
    l_shipinstruct, l_shipmode, l_comment
FROM iceberg.zz_iceberg_tpch_sf1000_iceberg_parquet_lz4.lineitem;

Engine	BAD 10br narrow ScanBytes
StarRocks (baseline)	149.1 GB
Trino	89.4 GB
StarRocks (this PR)	78.1 GB

The root cause: compound conjuncts are evaluated at the scanner level after all lazy columns have been backfilled, so expression short-circuit never prevents IO. And predicate-only columns are forced into the output chunk schema, so read_lazy_columns() must backfill them regardless of whether expression evaluation ever reached them.

What I'm doing:

Two changes:

1. Evaluate compound conjuncts inside GroupReader

Previously scanner_ctxs (multi-slot OR expressions) were evaluated at the scanner level after GroupReader::get_next() returned a fully-materialized chunk. Now they are evaluated inside get_next() while LazyMaterializationContext is still attached as MissingColumnProvider.

This allows ColumnRef to trigger materialize_slot() on-demand when the expression evaluator reaches a branch whose date-guard matches the current batch. Branches whose date-guard is all-false are short-circuited at the AND level — their payload columns are never loaded.

GroupReader::get_next():
  1. read active columns (l_shipdate)
  2. evaluate per-slot conjuncts (guard predicate) → filter
  2b. [NEW] evaluate scanner_ctxs (compound OR) with lazy_ctx attached
      → ColumnRef triggers materialize_slot() only for reached branches
  3. read_lazy_columns: backfill output columns, null-fill predicate-only columns

2. Skip physical IO for predicate-only untriggered columns

FE already distinguishes output columns from predicate columns via the isOutputColumn flag. In read_lazy_columns(), predicate-only columns that were never triggered during expression evaluation are null-filled instead of read from disk — they cost zero IO and their values are never accessed by downstream operators.

For count(*), all lazy columns are predicate-only, so only the 1-2 branches per batch that are actually reached incur physical IO.

3. Separate active/lazy IO ranges when lazy loading is active

SharedBufferedInputStream supports two modes: merged (active+lazy ranges coalesced into one buffer) and separated (independent buffers). In merged mode, reading the active column would fetch the entire merged range — including all lazy column data — defeating the physical IO savings. This PR forces separated mode when parquet_late_materialization_enable is on and lazy columns exist, so that untriggered lazy columns' data is never physically fetched.

Compromise

Predicate-only untriggered columns are null-filled rather than removed from the output chunk. The output chunk schema (_tuple_desc) includes all referenced columns, and reorder_chunk() downstream requires all slots to exist. The null-fill costs trivial memory but zero IO.

A follow-up PR will introduce an output_tuple_desc (filtered to is_output_column() slots) for output chunk creation, eliminating the null-fill entirely.

What type of PR is this:

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior. Produces identical results; IO reduction only.
Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.

Checklist:

I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
This pr needs auto generate documentation
This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
- 4.1
- 4.0
- 3.5

CelerData-Reviewer · 2026-06-16T08:01:08Z

@codex review

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 05b7e36091

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

CelerData-Reviewer · 2026-06-16T09:29:52Z

@codex review

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: b6c7b91e35

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

CelerData-Reviewer · 2026-06-16T21:21:33Z

@codex review

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 42cc009dc4

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

CelerData-Reviewer · 2026-06-17T03:26:54Z

@codex review

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6f9bf5bc0c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

CelerData-Reviewer · 2026-06-17T06:52:41Z

@codex review

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 9e4f0f8005

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

CelerData-Reviewer · 2026-06-17T10:01:37Z

@codex review

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 0871e538c5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

dirtysalt · 2026-06-17T12:08:39Z

@codex review

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-06-17T12:08:48Z

To use Codex here, create a Codex account and connect to github.

dirtysalt · 2026-06-17T12:12:00Z

@codex review

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-06-17T12:22:15Z

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Delightful!

Reviewed commit: 62218c1203

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

CelerData-Reviewer · 2026-06-17T21:42:17Z

@codex review

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-06-17T21:49:35Z

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. More of your lovely PRs please.

Reviewed commit: 6225939105

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Signed-off-by: tqqq <dirtysalt1987@gmail.com>

CelerData-Reviewer · 2026-06-18T07:45:11Z

@codex review

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 558d693a1b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

github-actions · 2026-06-18T08:58:26Z

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

github-actions · 2026-06-18T09:00:58Z

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

✅ pass : 2 / 2 (100.00%)

file detail

	path	covered_line	new_line	coverage	not_covered_line_detail
🔵	com/starrocks/sql/plan/PlanFragmentBuilder.java	2	2	100.00%	[]

github-actions · 2026-06-18T09:16:51Z

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

✅ pass : 464 / 526 (88.21%)

file detail

	path	covered_line	new_line	coverage	not_covered_line_detail
🔵	be/src/column/chunk.h	4	16	25.00%	[377, 378, 379, 380, 382, 383, 392, 393, 394, 395, 397, 398]
🔵	be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_orc.cpp	2	3	66.67%	[704]
🔵	be/src/formats/parquet/scalar_column_reader.cpp	64	91	70.33%	[660, 661, 663, 664, 665, 666, 667, 668, 669, 680, 683, 792, 793, 794, 795, 796, 797, 798, 799, 923, 924, 925, 926, 927, 928, 929, 930]
🔵	be/src/formats/parquet/lazy_materialization_context.cpp	38	48	79.17%	[38, 39, 52, 74, 75, 77, 93, 101, 102, 104]
🔵	be/src/formats/parquet/file_reader.cpp	4	5	80.00%	[430]
🔵	be/src/formats/parquet/scalar_column_reader.h	4	5	80.00%	[149]
🔵	be/src/formats/parquet/group_reader.cpp	110	116	94.83%	[309, 310, 311, 312, 315, 378]
🔵	be/src/formats/parquet/column_materializer.cpp	81	85	95.29%	[343, 345, 346, 477]
🔵	be/src/formats/parquet/complex_column_reader.cpp	26	26	100.00%	[]
🔵	be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_parquet.cpp	5	5	100.00%	[]
🔵	be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_avro.cpp	2	2	100.00%	[]
🔵	be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/jni_scanner.cpp	2	2	100.00%	[]
🔵	be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_text.cpp	2	2	100.00%	[]
🔵	be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_json.cpp	2	2	100.00%	[]
🔵	be/src/formats/parquet/read_range_planner.cpp	33	33	100.00%	[]
🔵	be/src/exprs/column_ref.cpp	4	4	100.00%	[]
🔵	be/src/formats/parquet/complex_column_reader.h	1	1	100.00%	[]
🔵	be/src/formats/parquet/read_range_planner.h	1	1	100.00%	[]
🔵	be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_context.cpp	47	47	100.00%	[]
🔵	be/src/formats/parquet/column_materializer.h	4	4	100.00%	[]
🔵	be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_partition.cpp	1	1	100.00%	[]
🔵	be/src/connector/hive_connector.cpp	9	9	100.00%	[]
🔵	be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner.cpp	8	8	100.00%	[]
🔵	be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_context.h	1	1	100.00%	[]
🔵	be/src/formats/parquet/lazy_materialization_context.h	8	8	100.00%	[]
🔵	be/src/formats/parquet/column_reader.h	1	1	100.00%	[]

github-actions · 2026-06-18T09:17:03Z

@Mergifyio backport branch-4.1

dirtysalt · 2026-06-18T09:20:49Z

@mergify backport branch-4.1

dirtysalt · 2026-06-18T09:23:39Z

@mergify backport branch-4.1

mergify · 2026-06-18T09:24:59Z

backport branch-4.1

✅ Backports have been created

Details

#75003 [Enhancement] Expression-driven on-demand lazy column loading for parquet scanner (backport #74886) has been created for branch branch-4.1 but encountered conflicts

Cherry-pick of b083761 has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/branch-4.1/pr-74886
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/branch-4.1'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit b083761f5f.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Changes to be committed:
	modified:   be/src/column/chunk.h
	modified:   be/src/connector/hive_connector.cpp
	modified:   be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_avro.cpp
	modified:   be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_json.cpp
	modified:   be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_orc.cpp
	modified:   be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_orc.h
	modified:   be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_parquet.h
	modified:   be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_partition.cpp
	modified:   be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_text.cpp
	modified:   be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/jni_scanner.cpp
	modified:   be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/jni_scanner.h
	modified:   be/src/exprs/column_ref.cpp
	modified:   be/src/formats/CMakeLists.txt
	modified:   be/src/formats/parquet/column_materializer.h
	modified:   be/src/formats/parquet/complex_column_reader.cpp
	new file:   be/src/formats/parquet/lazy_materialization_context.cpp
	modified:   be/src/formats/parquet/lazy_materialization_context.h
	new file:   be/src/formats/parquet/read_range_planner.cpp
	new file:   be/src/formats/parquet/read_range_planner.h
	modified:   be/test/formats/parquet/file_reader_test.cpp
	modified:   fe/fe-core/src/main/java/com/starrocks/sql/plan/PlanFragmentBuilder.java
	new file:   test/sql/test_iceberg/R/test_parquet_lazy_materialization
	new file:   test/sql/test_iceberg/T/test_parquet_lazy_materialization

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add/rm <file>..." as appropriate to mark resolution)
	both modified:   be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner.cpp
	both modified:   be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner.h
	deleted by us:   be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_context.cpp
	deleted by us:   be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_context.h
	both modified:   be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_parquet.cpp
	both modified:   be/src/formats/parquet/column_materializer.cpp
	both modified:   be/src/formats/parquet/column_reader.h
	both modified:   be/src/formats/parquet/complex_column_reader.h
	both modified:   be/src/formats/parquet/file_reader.cpp
	both modified:   be/src/formats/parquet/group_reader.cpp
	both modified:   be/src/formats/parquet/group_reader.h
	both modified:   be/src/formats/parquet/scalar_column_reader.cpp
	both modified:   be/src/formats/parquet/scalar_column_reader.h
	deleted by us:   be/src/formats/parquet/variant_projection.cpp
	deleted by us:   be/src/formats/parquet/variant_projection.h
	deleted by us:   be/src/formats/scan_context.h
	deleted by us:   be/test/formats/parquet/complex_column_reader_test.cpp
	both modified:   be/test/formats/parquet/group_reader_test.cpp

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally

mergify · 2026-06-18T09:25:23Z

backport branch-4.1

☑️ Command `backport branch-4.1` ignored because it is already running from a previous command.

mergify · 2026-06-18T09:25:43Z

backport branch-4.1

☑️ Command `backport branch-4.1` ignored because it is already running from a previous command.

…quet scanner (backport #74886) (#75003) Signed-off-by: tqqq <dirtysalt1987@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: tqqq <dirtysalt1987@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: wanpengfei-git <wanpengfei91@163.com>

…quet scanner (StarRocks#74886) Signed-off-by: tqqq <dirtysalt1987@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: wanpengfei-git <wanpengfei91@163.com> Signed-off-by: Oliver Layer <o.layer@celonis.com>

github-actions Bot added the title needs [type] label Jun 16, 2026

mergify Bot assigned dirtysalt Jun 16, 2026

dirtysalt changed the title ~~lat on be side~~ [Enhancement] Expression-driven on-demand lazy column loading for Parquet scanner Jun 16, 2026

github-actions Bot added 4.1 and removed title needs [type] labels Jun 16, 2026

github-actions Bot requested review from stdpain and trueeyu June 16, 2026 08:01

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jun 16, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread be/src/formats/parquet/group_reader.cpp Outdated

Comment thread be/src/formats/parquet/variant_projection.cpp Outdated

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jun 16, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_context.cpp Outdated

dirtysalt changed the title ~~[Enhancement] Expression-driven on-demand lazy column loading for Parquet scanner~~ [Enhancement] Expression-driven on-demand lazy column loading for parquet scanner Jun 16, 2026

dirtysalt force-pushed the parquet-latmat-phase678-v2 branch from 47a52c8 to 42cc009 Compare June 16, 2026 21:19

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jun 16, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner_context.cpp Outdated

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jun 17, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread be/src/exec/hdfs_scanner/hdfs_scanner.cpp

Comment thread be/src/formats/parquet/read_range_planner.cpp

dirtysalt force-pushed the parquet-latmat-phase678-v2 branch from 6f9bf5b to c414f36 Compare June 17, 2026 06:51

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jun 17, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread be/src/formats/parquet/group_reader.cpp Outdated

Comment thread be/src/formats/parquet/group_reader.cpp

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jun 17, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread be/src/formats/parquet/group_reader.cpp Outdated

dirtysalt force-pushed the parquet-latmat-phase678-v2 branch from 62218c1 to 6225939 Compare June 17, 2026 21:41

dirtysalt enabled auto-merge (squash) June 18, 2026 00:00

dirtysalt and others added 7 commits June 18, 2026 14:58

add sql-test with variant

ad697b9

Signed-off-by: tqqq <dirtysalt1987@gmail.com>

style: auto-fix clang-format issues

aa4636b

Signed-off-by: tqqq <dirtysalt1987@gmail.com>

refactor group_reader::get_next

ffe6a8e

Signed-off-by: tqqq <dirtysalt1987@gmail.com>

adjust order of emit physical and side columns

b002a6c

Signed-off-by: tqqq <dirtysalt1987@gmail.com>

style: auto-fix clang-format issues

32b9035

Signed-off-by: tqqq <dirtysalt1987@gmail.com>

fix per comment

ebd3685

Signed-off-by: tqqq <dirtysalt1987@gmail.com>

fix conflict

558d693

Signed-off-by: tqqq <dirtysalt1987@gmail.com>

dirtysalt dismissed stale reviews from trueeyu and kevincai via 558d693 June 18, 2026 07:44

dirtysalt force-pushed the parquet-latmat-phase678-v2 branch from 6225939 to 558d693 Compare June 18, 2026 07:44

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jun 18, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread be/src/formats/parquet/read_range_planner.cpp

stdpain approved these changes Jun 18, 2026

View reviewed changes

trueeyu approved these changes Jun 18, 2026

View reviewed changes

dirtysalt merged commit b083761 into StarRocks:main Jun 18, 2026
72 checks passed

github-actions Bot removed the 4.1 label Jun 18, 2026

dirtysalt deleted the parquet-latmat-phase678-v2 branch June 18, 2026 09:21

mergify Bot mentioned this pull request Jun 18, 2026

[Enhancement] Expression-driven on-demand lazy column loading for parquet scanner (backport #74886) #75003

Merged

17 tasks

github-actions Bot added the 4.1-merged label Jun 18, 2026

Uh oh!

Conversation

dirtysalt commented Jun 16, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Why I'm doing:

What I'm doing:

1. Evaluate compound conjuncts inside GroupReader

2. Skip physical IO for predicate-only untriggered columns

3. Separate active/lazy IO ranges when lazy loading is active

Compromise

What type of PR is this:

Checklist:

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

Uh oh!

CelerData-Reviewer commented Jun 16, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

CelerData-Reviewer commented Jun 16, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

CelerData-Reviewer commented Jun 16, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

CelerData-Reviewer commented Jun 17, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

CelerData-Reviewer commented Jun 17, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

CelerData-Reviewer commented Jun 17, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

dirtysalt commented Jun 17, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Uh oh!

dirtysalt commented Jun 17, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Uh oh!

CelerData-Reviewer commented Jun 17, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Uh oh!

CelerData-Reviewer commented Jun 18, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 18, 2026

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

dirtysalt commented Jun 16, 2026 •

edited

Loading

mergify Bot commented Jun 18, 2026 •

edited

Loading

☑️ Command `backport branch-4.1` ignored because it is already running from a previous command.

☑️ Command `backport branch-4.1` ignored because it is already running from a previous command.