Skip to content

xmldom: Creation-time XML Name/QName validation is bypassable via an embedded line terminator, allowing injection on the default serialization path

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Aug 21, 2026 in xmldom/xmldom • Updated Sep 8, 2026

Package

npm @xmldom/xmldom (npm)

Affected versions

>= 0.9.0, <= 0.9.11

Patched versions

0.9.12

Description

Summary

An embedded line terminator bypasses xmldom's always-on, WHATWG-mandated creation-time name
validation. createElementNS, createAttributeNS, createDocumentType, and createAttribute should
reject a malformed qualified name with InvalidCharacterError, but a name whose first line is
well-formed slips through and enters the DOM. On serialization it is emitted verbatim, so the
characters after the line terminator inject markup into the output. The injection reaches the default
serialization path, and enabling requireWellFormed does not prevent it.

Details

createElementNS, createAttributeNS, and createDocumentType route through validateQualifiedName,
and createAttribute performs the analogous check; each validates the name with
g.QName_exact.test(name). QName_exact = reg('^', QName, '$') inherits the m flag from xmldom's
shared regexp builder, so the matcher accepts any name whose first line is a valid QName and leaves
the remaining lines unconstrained (see Root Cause).

Root Cause

  1. A shared regexp builder compiles anchored productions with the m flag.
  2. ^…$ under m are line anchors, not string anchors.
  3. validateQualifiedName / createAttribute validate with .test() against such a production, so a
    line terminator followed by breakout markup passes and the malformed name is stored.

The triggering line terminators are the ECMAScript LineTerminator set: U+000A, U+000D, U+2028, U+2029.

Proof of Concept

const { DOMImplementation, XMLSerializer } = require('@xmldom/xmldom');
const impl = new DOMImplementation();

const doc = impl.createDocument('urn:x', 'root', null);
const el = doc.createElementNS('urn:x', 'a\n><script>x</script');  // ACCEPTED (no throw)
doc.documentElement.appendChild(el);

// DEFAULT serialization — requireWellFormed NOT set:
console.log(new XMLSerializer().serializeToString(doc));
// Observed: <root xmlns="urn:x"><a
// ><script>x</script/></root>          <-- injected element on the default path
// Control: createElementNS('urn:x', 'bad>name') throws InvalidCharacterError, confirming the check is
// active and specifically bypassed by the line terminator.

Impact

  • Bypass of the always-on WHATWG creation-time name validation (InvalidCharacterError): a
    malformed name the standard requires be rejected at creation is instead admitted to the DOM.
  • Markup / structure injection. An application relying on the create* APIs to reject malformed
    names (the standard behavior) as a trust boundary is exposed; where the serialized output reaches an
    HTML context, downstream XSS.
  • No serializer option mitigates it. The admitted name is emitted verbatim under both the default
    path and requireWellFormed: true — the strict serializer shares the same m-flagged blind spot
    (the subject of the sibling serializer advisories) — so the bypassed creation-time check was the only
    layer that could have stopped it. Demonstrated for all four create* sites in
    poc_creation_strict_serialization_bypass.cjs.

Fix Applied

createElementNS, createAttributeNS, createDocumentType, and createAttribute now reject a name
containing a line terminator with InvalidCharacterError — the same result they already give for
other malformed names — because name validation now applies to the whole string. The
requireWellFormed serializer's name checks are corrected by the same change. The fix is
non-breaking: such a name was already invalid, and no previously-accepted well-formed name is affected.

References

@karfau karfau published to xmldom/xmldom Aug 21, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Sep 1, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Sep 8, 2026
Reviewed Sep 8, 2026
Last updated Sep 8, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required None
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity High
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(25th percentile)

Weaknesses

XML Injection (aka Blind XPath Injection)

The product does not properly neutralize special elements that are used in XML, allowing attackers to modify the syntax, content, or commands of the XML before it is processed by an end system. Learn more on MITRE.

Permissive Regular Expression

The product uses a regular expression that does not sufficiently restrict the set of allowed values. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-83609

GHSA ID

GHSA-3px3-54cx-rmw9

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.