Skip to content

Unsigned SAML LogoutRequest Acceptance in gosaml2

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Mar 18, 2026 in russellhaering/gosaml2 • Updated Mar 18, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2 (Go)

Affected versions

<= 0.10.0

Patched versions

0.11.0

Description

Summary

The ValidateEncodedLogoutRequestPOST function in gosaml2 accepts completely unsigned SAML LogoutRequest messages even when SkipSignatureValidation is set to false. When validateElementSignature returns dsig.ErrMissingSignature, the code in decode_logout_request.go:60-62 silently falls through to process the unverified XML element instead of rejecting it. An attacker who can reach the SP's Single Logout endpoint can forge a LogoutRequest for any user, terminating their session without possessing the IdP's signing key.

Affected Version

  • Library: github.com/russellhaering/gosaml2
  • Version: All versions up to and including the latest commit on main (as of 2026-03-16)
  • File: decode_logout_request.go, lines 58-69

Vulnerable Code

// decode_logout_request.go:57-69
var requestSignatureValidated bool
if !sp.SkipSignatureValidation {
    el, err = sp.validateElementSignature(el)
    if err == dsig.ErrMissingSignature {
        // Unfortunately we just blew away our Response
        el = doc.Root()                    // <-- BUG: falls through with unsigned element
    } else if err != nil {
        return nil, err
    } else if el == nil {
        return nil, fmt.Errorf("missing transformed logout request")
    } else {
        requestSignatureValidated = true
    }
}

When ErrMissingSignature is returned, the code resets el to the raw document root and continues. The requestSignatureValidated variable remains false, but no error is returned. The unsigned LogoutRequest is unmarshalled and passed to ValidateDecodedLogoutRequest, which performs attribute/issuer checks but does not verify that a signature was present.

Attack Details

Property Value
Attack vector Network (HTTP POST to SLO endpoint)
Authentication required None
Payload size ~450 bytes (unsigned XML)
User interaction None
Complexity Low -- only requires knowledge of the SP's SLO URL and IdP issuer
CVSS estimate 7.5 (High) -- Network/Low/None/None, Availability impact

Impact

  • Arbitrary session termination: An attacker can force-logout any user by forging a LogoutRequest with the victim's NameID. This is a targeted denial-of-service.
  • Business disruption: Critical users (executives, admins, operators) can be repeatedly logged out, disrupting access to the application during incidents or time-sensitive operations.
  • Security control bypass: If session termination triggers downstream effects (e.g., revoking tokens, clearing caches), an attacker can weaponize this to force re-authentication flows and potentially intercept them.
  • No cryptographic material needed: The attacker does not need the IdP's private key. The forged request contains zero cryptographic elements.

Suggested Fix

When ErrMissingSignature is returned and SkipSignatureValidation is false, the function should return an error instead of falling through:

// decode_logout_request.go -- fixed version
var requestSignatureValidated bool
if !sp.SkipSignatureValidation {
    el, err = sp.validateElementSignature(el)
    if err == dsig.ErrMissingSignature {
        // FIXED: reject unsigned requests when signature validation is required
        return nil, fmt.Errorf("logout request is not signed: %w", dsig.ErrMissingSignature)
    } else if err != nil {
        return nil, err
    } else if el == nil {
        return nil, fmt.Errorf("missing transformed logout request")
    } else {
        requestSignatureValidated = true
    }
}

This ensures that unsigned LogoutRequest messages are rejected when SkipSignatureValidation is false, matching the behavior that operators expect when they configure signature enforcement.

Attached lab
f1_unsigned_logout.zip

References

@russellhaering russellhaering published to russellhaering/gosaml2 Mar 18, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Mar 18, 2026
Reviewed Mar 18, 2026
Last updated Mar 18, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

No known CVE

GHSA ID

GHSA-pcgw-qcv5-h8ch

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.