Summary
Rack::Files#fail sets the Content-Length response header using String#size instead of String#bytesize. When the response body contains multibyte UTF-8 characters, the declared Content-Length is smaller than the number of bytes actually sent on the wire.
Because Rack::Files reflects the requested path in 404 responses, an attacker can trigger this mismatch by requesting a non-existent path containing percent-encoded UTF-8 characters.
This results in incorrect HTTP response framing and may cause response desynchronization in deployments that rely on the incorrect Content-Length value.
Details
Rack::Files#fail constructs error responses using logic equivalent to:
def fail(status, body, headers = {})
body += "\n"
[
status,
{
"content-type" => "text/plain",
"content-length" => body.size.to_s,
"x-cascade" => "pass"
}.merge!(headers),
[body]
]
end
Here, body.size returns the number of characters, not the number of bytes. For multibyte UTF-8 strings, this produces an incorrect Content-Length value.
Rack::Files includes the decoded request path in 404 responses. A request containing percent-encoded UTF-8 path components therefore causes the response body to contain multibyte characters, while the Content-Length header still reflects character count rather than byte count.
As a result, the server can send more bytes than declared in the response headers.
This violates HTTP message framing requirements, which define Content-Length as the number of octets in the message body.
Impact
Applications using Rack::Files may emit incorrectly framed error responses when handling requests for non-existent paths containing multibyte characters.
In some deployment topologies, particularly with keep-alive connections and intermediaries that rely on Content-Length, this mismatch may lead to response parsing inconsistencies or response desynchronization. The practical exploitability depends on the behavior of downstream proxies, clients, and connection reuse.
Even where no secondary exploitation is possible, the response is malformed and may trigger protocol errors in strict components.
Mitigation
- Update to a patched version of Rack that computes
Content-Length using String#bytesize.
- Avoid exposing
Rack::Files directly to untrusted traffic until a fix is available, if operationally feasible.
- Where possible, place Rack behind a proxy or server that normalizes or rejects malformed backend responses.
- Prefer closing backend connections on error paths if response framing anomalies are a concern.
References
Summary
Rack::Files#failsets theContent-Lengthresponse header usingString#sizeinstead ofString#bytesize. When the response body contains multibyte UTF-8 characters, the declaredContent-Lengthis smaller than the number of bytes actually sent on the wire.Because
Rack::Filesreflects the requested path in 404 responses, an attacker can trigger this mismatch by requesting a non-existent path containing percent-encoded UTF-8 characters.This results in incorrect HTTP response framing and may cause response desynchronization in deployments that rely on the incorrect
Content-Lengthvalue.Details
Rack::Files#failconstructs error responses using logic equivalent to:Here,
body.sizereturns the number of characters, not the number of bytes. For multibyte UTF-8 strings, this produces an incorrectContent-Lengthvalue.Rack::Filesincludes the decoded request path in 404 responses. A request containing percent-encoded UTF-8 path components therefore causes the response body to contain multibyte characters, while theContent-Lengthheader still reflects character count rather than byte count.As a result, the server can send more bytes than declared in the response headers.
This violates HTTP message framing requirements, which define
Content-Lengthas the number of octets in the message body.Impact
Applications using
Rack::Filesmay emit incorrectly framed error responses when handling requests for non-existent paths containing multibyte characters.In some deployment topologies, particularly with keep-alive connections and intermediaries that rely on
Content-Length, this mismatch may lead to response parsing inconsistencies or response desynchronization. The practical exploitability depends on the behavior of downstream proxies, clients, and connection reuse.Even where no secondary exploitation is possible, the response is malformed and may trigger protocol errors in strict components.
Mitigation
Content-LengthusingString#bytesize.Rack::Filesdirectly to untrusted traffic until a fix is available, if operationally feasible.References