Skip to content

TypiCMS Core has Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via SVG File Upload

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Feb 21, 2026 in typicms/core • Updated Jul 9, 2026

Package

composer typicms/core (Composer)

Affected versions

>= 16.0.0, < 16.1.7
>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.29
>= 14.0.0, < 14.0.27
>= 13.0.0, < 13.0.9
< 12.0.5

Patched versions

16.1.7
15.0.29
14.0.27
13.0.9
12.0.5

Description

I. Summary

A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the file upload module of TypiCMS. The application allows users with file upload permissions to upload SVG files. While there is a MIME type validation, the content of the SVG file is not sanitized. An attacker can upload a specially crafted SVG file containing malicious JavaScript code. When another user (such as an administrator) views or accesses this file through the application, the script executes in their browser, leading to a compromise of that user's session.

The issue is exacerbated by a bug in the SVG parsing logic, which can cause a 500 error if the uploaded SVG does not contain a viewBox attribute. However, this does not mitigate the XSS vulnerability, as an attacker can easily include a valid viewBox attribute in their malicious payload.

II. Vulnerability Details

  • Vulnerability Type: Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
  • Affected Component: TypiCMS\Modules\Core\Http\Requests\FileFormRequest.php and TypiCMS\Modules\Core\Services\FileUploader.php.
  • Affected Versions: <= 16.0.5

The vulnerability stems from two main points:

  1. Permissive File Validation: The FileFormRequest explicitly whitelists svg as an allowed MIME type for uploads.
  2. Lack of Content Sanitization: The FileUploader service saves the SVG file to the server without parsing and sanitizing its content to remove potentially malicious elements like <script> tags or on* event handlers.

When the default filesystem disk is set to public, the uploaded SVG file is stored in a publicly accessible directory, making it trivial to access the file via a direct URL and trigger the XSS payload.

III. Proof of Concept (PoC)

  1. Create a Malicious SVG File:
    Create a file named malicious.svg with the following content. The viewBox attribute is included to bypass the application's parsing bug.

    <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 100 100">
        <script>
            // A simple PoC to demonstrate the vulnerability
            alert('XSS in TypiCMS! Your session cookie is: ' + document.cookie);
        </script>
        <text x="10" y="50">If you see this, the script has run.</text>
    </svg>
  2. Upload the Malicious File:

    • Log in to the TypiCMS admin panel as a user with permissions to upload files.
    • Navigate to the "Files" module (e.g., /admin/files).
    • Upload the malicious.svg file. The application will accept the file and store it.

image

image

  1. Trigger the XSS:
    • The application will provide a public URL for the uploaded file, typically in the format http://<your-site>/storage/files/malicious.svg.
    • Anyone who navigates to this URL will have the embedded JavaScript executed in their browser.
    • An attacker can send this link to a privileged user (e.g., an administrator). When the administrator clicks the link, their session cookies can be stolen, or the attacker can perform actions on their behalf.

image

image

IV. Impact

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability allows an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the victim's browser. Although the use of the HttpOnly flag on session cookies prevents direct theft of the session ID via document.cookie, the attacker can still achieve a full compromise of the victim's account by performing actions on their behalf.

The impact includes:

  • Account Takeover via Action Forgery: The attacker's script can make authenticated requests to the application's API from the victim's browser. This allows the attacker to perform any action the victim is authorized to do, such as:

    • Creating a new administrator account for the attacker.
    • Changing the victim's email address and password.
    • Deleting or modifying all content, users, and settings.
  • Sensitive Information Disclosure: The script can read the content of any page the victim views within the admin panel. This includes lists of users (with names and emails), private application settings, and other sensitive data, which can then be exfiltrated to an attacker-controlled server.

  • Phishing and Social Engineering: The script can manipulate the admin panel's UI to display fake login forms to trick the user into re-entering their credentials, or redirect them to a malicious website.

  • Keystroke Logging: The script can capture any information the victim types into forms on the compromised page.

Because the attacker can perform any action as an authenticated administrator, this vulnerability effectively leads to a full application compromise, even without direct access to the session cookie. The risk is High.

V. Recommended Patches and Mitigations

It is recommended to apply a defense-in-depth approach to mitigate this vulnerability.

  1. Primary Fix: Sanitize SVG Content:
    The most robust solution is to sanitize SVG files upon upload. Before saving the file, it should be parsed to remove all potentially dangerous elements, including <script>, <style>, <foreignObject> tags, and all on* event attributes. This can be achieved using a dedicated SVG sanitization library.

  2. Secondary Fix: Disable SVG Uploads:
    If SVG uploads are not a critical feature for the application, the simplest and most secure solution is to disable them entirely. This can be done by removing 'svg' from the list of allowed MIME types in TypiCMS\Modules\Core\Http\Requests\FileFormRequest.php.

    // In FileFormRequest.php
    // BEFORE:
    $fileRule = 'mimes:jpeg,gif,png,...,svg,...|max:...';
    
    // AFTER:
    $fileRule = 'mimes:jpeg,gif,png,...,pdf,...|max:...'; // Removed 'svg'
  3. Hardening - Content-Security-Policy (CSP):
    Implement a strict Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header for the application. A well-configured CSP can prevent the execution of inline scripts, which would mitigate the impact of this XSS vulnerability.

  4. Hardening - Serve User Content from a Separate Domain:
    Serve all user-uploaded files from a separate, cookie-less domain. This is a highly effective security measure that isolates user-generated content from the main application, preventing scripts from accessing session cookies or interacting with the application's DOM.

References

@sdebacker sdebacker published to typicms/core Feb 21, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Feb 25, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Feb 25, 2026
Reviewed Feb 25, 2026
Last updated Jul 9, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required Low
User interaction Active
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity None
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(9th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-27621

GHSA ID

GHSA-xfvg-8v67-j7wp

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.