added reference for RFC9911, close #146 - #148
Open
mcr wants to merge 7 commits into
Open
Conversation
EskoDijk
reviewed
Aug 5, 2026
| > | ||
| > Provisional registration? (standards tree only): | ||
| > : NO | ||
| IANA is requested to update the registration of media type: `application/voucher-cms+json` to change the Published Specification to THIS-DOCUMENT. |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We're using multiple labels for the same currently:
[This RFC]
THIS DOCUMENT
THIS-DOCUMENT
this document
It's probably easiest for reviewers/editors if only one label is used?
EskoDijk
reviewed
Aug 5, 2026
| RFC-editor, please remove. | ||
| This section just lists references present in YANG modules which otherwise do not get included in the references, like {{!RFC7250}}. | ||
|
|
||
| Also {{!RFC9911}}, Common YANG Data Types, and {{RFC8791}} is SX:Structure. |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
RFC 8791 is already referenced a couple of times from main text - to avoid confusion, I suggest to not include it here. The purpose was just to ensure the refs are there and this one was.
Suggested change
| Also {{!RFC9911}}, Common YANG Data Types, and {{RFC8791}} is SX:Structure. | |
| Also {{!RFC9911}}, Common YANG Data Types. |
EskoDijk
reviewed
Aug 5, 2026
| "Updates and additions described by RFC XXXX"; | ||
| reference | ||
| "RFC XXXX: A Voucher Artifact for Bootstrapping Protocols"; | ||
| "RFC XXXX: A Voucher Request Artifact for Bootstrapping Protocols"; |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"Request" is not in the title of our new RFC - is this an accidental replace?
EskoDijk
requested changes
Aug 5, 2026
EskoDijk
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, left some suggestions/comments and the rest looks good.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this PR addresses DISCUSS and COMMENS from Ketan.