Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Removes Early Access (EA) labeling for DPoP across the SDK’s examples and API documentation comments, aligning the docs with DPoP’s GA status.
Changes:
- Update
EXAMPLES.mdTOC entries and section headings fromDPoP [EA]toDPoP, removing EA note callouts. - Remove EA “Availability” doc comment blocks from the DPoP-related Swift types and APIs.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| EXAMPLES.md | Renames DPoP sections/anchors and removes EA note blocks in example docs. |
| Auth0/DPoP/SenderConstraining.swift | Removes EA availability docs from SenderConstraining and useDPoP. |
| Auth0/DPoP/DPoP.swift | Removes EA availability docs from DPoP and related methods. |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
EXAMPLES.md
Outdated
| > This feature is currently available in [Early Access](https://auth0.com/docs/troubleshoot/product-lifecycle/product-release-stages#early-access). Please reach out to Auth0 support to get it enabled for your tenant. | ||
| ### DPoP | ||
|
|
||
| [DPoP](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9449.html) (Demonstrating Proof of Posession) is an application-level mechanism for sender-constraining OAuth 2.0 access and refresh tokens by proving that the app is in possession of a certain private key. You can enable it by calling the `useDPoP()` method. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo in the DPoP definition: “Proof of Posession” should be “Proof of Possession” (double “s”).
EXAMPLES.md
Outdated
| > This feature is currently available in [Early Access](https://auth0.com/docs/troubleshoot/product-lifecycle/product-release-stages#early-access). Please reach out to Auth0 support to get it enabled for your tenant. | ||
| ### DPoP | ||
|
|
||
| [DPoP](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9449.html) (Demonstrating Proof of Posession) is an application-level mechanism for sender-constraining OAuth 2.0 access and refresh tokens by proving that the app is in possession of a certain private key. You can enable it by calling the `useDPoP()` method. This ensures that DPoP proofs are generated for requests made through the Authentication API client. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo in the DPoP definition: “Proof of Posession” should be “Proof of Possession” (double “s”).
Suggested change
| [DPoP](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9449.html) (Demonstrating Proof of Posession) is an application-level mechanism for sender-constraining OAuth 2.0 access and refresh tokens by proving that the app is in possession of a certain private key. You can enable it by calling the `useDPoP()` method. This ensures that DPoP proofs are generated for requests made through the Authentication API client. | |
| [DPoP](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9449.html) (Demonstrating Proof of Possession) is an application-level mechanism for sender-constraining OAuth 2.0 access and refresh tokens by proving that the app is in possession of a certain private key. You can enable it by calling the `useDPoP()` method. This ensures that DPoP proofs are generated for requests made through the Authentication API client. |
sanchitmehtagit
approved these changes
Mar 6, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📋 Changes
This PR removes the EA tag from DPoP APIs since it has been officially announced as GA
📎 References
https://auth0.com/docs/secure/sender-constraining/demonstrating-proof-of-possession-dpop