Add k9s to DevOps Tools section

[Hamed233]

• k9s: Kubernetes CLI to manage your clusters in style
• Popular terminal UI for Kubernetes cluster management
• Provides real-time cluster monitoring and resource management
• Repository: https://github.com/derailed/k9s
• pkg.go.dev: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/derailed/k9s

We want to ensure high quality of the packages. Make sure that you've checked the boxes below before sending a pull request.

• I have read the Contribution Guidelines
• I have read the Maintainers Note
• I have read the Quality Standards

Not every repository (project) will require every option, but most projects should. Check the Contribution Guidelines for details.

• The repo documentation has a pkg.go.dev link.
• The repo documentation has a coverage service link.
• The repo documentation has a goreportcard link.
• The repo has a version-numbered release and a go.mod file.
• The repo has a continuous integration process that automatically runs tests that must pass before new pull requests are merged.
• Continuous integration is used to attempt to catch issues prior to releasing this package to end-users.

Please provide some links to your package to ease the review

• forge link (github.com, gitlab.com, etc):
• pkg.go.dev:
• goreportcard.com:
• coverage service link (codecov, coveralls, etc.):

Pull Request content

• The package has been added to the list in alphabetical order.
• The package has an appropriate description with correct grammar.
• As far as I know, the package has not been listed here before.

Category quality

Note that new categories can be added only when there are 3 packages or more.

Packages added a long time ago might not meet the current guidelines anymore. It would be very helpful if you could check 3-5 packages above and below your submission to ensure that they also still meet the Quality Standards.

Please delete one of the following lines:

• The packages around my addition still meet the Quality Standards.
• I removed the following packages around my addition: (please give a short reason for each removal)

Thanks for your PR, you're awesome! 😎

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added k9s to the "Software written in Go" list in the README, extending the catalog of referenced Go projects and improving discoverability for users exploring Go-based tools. No public APIs or exported declarations were changed. The update is small and requires low review effort.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The README.md was updated to add a new entry for k9s in the "Software written in Go" section; no code or exported/public declarations were changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Update README.md	Added k9s entry to the "Software written in Go" section of the README.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

• Notes: Single-line documentation addition; no codepaths to review.

Suggested reviewers

• kutistefanova9-art

Poem

🐰 A line in README, small and spry,
k9s hops in with a gleam in its eye.
One nibble of text, tidy and bright,
The list grows a bit — a joyful sight. ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title Check	⚠️ Warning	The PR title states "Add k9s to DevOps Tools section," but according to the raw_summary of actual file changes, k9s was added to the "Software written in Go section," not the DevOps Tools section. This discrepancy indicates the title is misleading—it describes a location that does not match where the change actually occurred in the changeset. While k9s is genuinely being added to the README.md as mentioned in the title, the specific section referenced is incorrect.	The title should be updated to accurately reflect where k9s was added. Consider revising it to "Add k9s to Software written in Go section" or another title that correctly identifies the section in which the entry appears, ensuring alignment between the title and the actual changes made to the repository.
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 29a73fe and 7ee57e0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• README.md

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
• GitHub Check: quality

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

Automated Quality Checks (from CONTRIBUTING minimum standards)

• Repo link: missing
• pkg.go.dev: OK
• goreportcard: missing
• coverage: missing

These checks are a best-effort automation and do not replace human review.