Communicado

Closed-loop optimization of central bank communication through LLM-simulated focus groups.

A central bank publishes one press release written in expert language. A pensioner and a financial analyst read the same sentence — and react in opposite ways. Communicado closes this gap: it runs a press release through a multi-agent closed loop — synthetic focus-group interviews → analysis → rewriting → validation — until the text becomes clear to every audience without losing a single fact.

Built around real press releases of the Bank of Russia. Works out of the box without any API keys (deterministic mock mode), or with the Anthropic API for live runs.

Читайте эту страницу по-русски.

---

Why

Fact	Source
Only ~30% of households update expectations after a central bank decision	Lamla & Vinogradov (2024, JME)
Flesch Reading Ease of original releases ≈ 35 — "very difficult"	Oborneva (2006), Russian adaptation
Experts and non-experts react to the same CB phrase in opposite directions	Kim & Lee, Bounded Rationality in CB Communication
37% of Russians get economic news from Telegram	NAFI (2024)

Real focus groups take weeks and cost money. LLM-simulated ones take minutes — recent research (Argyle et al. 2023; Horton 2023) shows LLM "silicon samples" reproduce human survey behavior with ρ ≈ 0.85. Communicado turns that idea into a working feedback loop for communication policy.

How it works

flowchart LR
    R([CB press release]) --> X[Extractor<br/>5 key points]
    X --> I[Interviews<br/>6 personas × 6 questions]
    I --> A[Analyst<br/>Score 0–100 + problem list]
    A --> E[Editor<br/>rewrites the text]
    E --> V{Validator<br/>all key points intact?}
    V -- no, retry --> E
    V -- yes --> C{Converged?}
    C -- no --> I
    C -- yes --> F([Final text])

Loading

Six agent roles (extractor, interviewer, 6 personas, analyst, editor, validator) talk to each other over a single LLM gateway (llm.py). The validator guarantees factual integrity: if any of the 5 extracted key points is lost or an investment recommendation sneaks in, the edit is rejected and redone.

Three independent metric systems

Relying on a single LLM judge is fragile, so every iteration is scored three ways:

• Communication Score (LLM, 0–100) — comprehension across the persona panel, calibrated with anchor points;
• Flesch Reading Ease — deterministic readability formula adapted for Russian (Oborneva, 2006) + jargon counter over a CB-specific stop list;
• Sentiment Balance — dictionary-based ratio of alarming vs. reassuring words, fully LLM-independent.

Synthetic personas

Six personas with 19-field profiles, differentiated along 7 axes taken from the literature (financial literacy, information channel, debt exposure, age, institutional trust, cognitive gap, attention rate). The profile format mirrors the Bank of Russia's own focus-group methodology.

Persona	Role	Key axis	Attention
Valentina, 67	Pensioner, Voronezh	Low literacy, TV news, high anxiety	~25%
Alexey, 38	CFO, Moscow	Expert, reads cbr.ru directly	~95%
Olga, 34	Mortgage holder, Kazan	Maximum rate sensitivity	~60%
Sergey, 45	Truck driver, Chelyabinsk	Minimal assets, minimal attention	~15%
Pavel, 51	Business owner, Krasnodar	Credit channel, pricing power	~30%
Daniil, 22	Economics student, St. Petersburg	Youth, social media, theory without practice	~15%

Results

On 4 real Bank of Russia press releases (Oct 2025 – Mar 2026), 6 personas, adaptive interviews:

• 4/4 runs show monotonic Score growth;
• +27 average Communication Score gain (from 35–42 up to 62–72);
• 0.0 sentiment balance after optimization — alarm neutralized;
• 72 best score (release of 20.03.2026, key rate cut to 15%).

Before / after (release of 20.03.2026)

Original (Score 42)	After 3 iterations (Score 72)
"снизить ключевую ставку на 50 б.п., до 15,00% годовых" (cut the key rate by 50 bp, to 15.00% per annum)	"снизить ключевую ставку на 0,5 процентного пункта — до 15%. От этой ставки зависят проценты по вкладам и кредитам" (…this rate is what your deposit and loan rates depend on)
"устойчивые показатели текущего роста цен остаются в диапазоне 4–5% в пересчете на год"	"базовая инфляция — рост цен на товары и услуги, кроме продуктов и топлива — остается в диапазоне 4–5% в год" (core inflation explained in plain words)
"значимо выросла неопределенность со стороны внешних условий"	"ситуация в мире стала менее предсказуемой, и это может повлиять на российскую экономику" (the world got less predictable, and it may affect the economy)

One release → every channel

Each communication channel runs its own closed loop with the personas of its target audience:

Channel	Audience	Score	Style
Official release (cbr.ru)	Alexey, Pavel	45 → 68	Formal, terminology allowed
CB Telegram channel	Alexey, Daniil, Olga	45 → 78	Accessible, ≤1000 chars
Business media	Alexey, Pavel	45 → 75	Numbers, forecasts, credit focus
VK Clips / Reels	Daniil, Olga	45 → 78	60-second script, informal

Telegram bot: communication of one

The bot takes personalization to its logical end — a press release explained for you personally:

1. Onboarding — the bot asks about age, occupation, mortgage, savings, news sources;
2. Persona building — answers become a 19-field profile;
3. Closed loop — the release is optimized against that single persona;
4. Personal text + Q&A — the user receives their own explanation and can ask follow-up questions.

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/bzgly/communicado.git
cd communicado
pip install -r requirements.txt

# Interactive demo — runs in mock mode, no API key needed
streamlit run app.py

To run against the real Claude API:

cp .env.example .env    # put your ANTHROPIC_API_KEY there
python run_one.py release 3     # optimize the latest release, 3 iterations
python run_one.py channel vk_clips

Other entry points:

python -m pytest tests/ -v      # 32 unit/integration tests (mock mode)
USE_MOCK=0 python test_prod.py  # smoke tests against the live API
python bot.py                   # Telegram bot (needs BOT_TOKEN in .env)

Environment variables: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY (live mode), CLAUDE_MODEL (default claude-opus-4-8), USE_MOCK=1/0 (force mock on/off), BOT_TOKEN (bot only).

Project structure

communicado/
├── engine.py             # closed loop: extract → interview → analyze → edit → validate
├── llm.py                # LLM gateway: Anthropic API + deterministic mock mode
├── interview.py          # interviewer agent: scripted & adaptive (LLM follow-ups) modes
├── personas.py           # 6 personas, 19 fields, 7 literature-grounded axes
├── prompts.py            # system prompts for every agent role
├── readability.py        # deterministic metrics: Flesch-RU, jargon count, sentiment
├── channels.py           # 5 CB communication channels with target audiences
├── sample_releases.py    # 4 real Bank of Russia press releases
├── mock_data.py          # calibrated mock responses for API-free demo
├── app.py                # Streamlit demo (loop + channels + comparison)
├── bot.py                # Telegram bot for personal communication
├── run_one.py            # single benchmark run → results/*.json
├── run_benchmarks.py     # batch runs for the presentation
├── build_charts.py       # Plotly charts from results
├── build_presentation.py # PDF deck generator (reportlab)
├── test_prod.py          # smoke tests against the live API
├── tests/                # unit & integration tests
└── docs/                 # presentation.pdf, defense speech

Limitations

• LLMs stereotype. Personas are calibrated along 7 literature-based axes; the next step is validation against real focus-group transcripts.
• LLM scores fluctuate. That is exactly why deterministic metrics (Flesch, jargon count, sentiment balance) run alongside.
• Not a replacement for real focus groups — a rapid-iteration tool between them: minutes instead of weeks.
• Simplification can amplify anxiety (Kim & Lee effect): a clearer text delivers an alarming signal more strongly. The sentiment metric watches for this.

References

1. Argyle et al. (2023). "Out of One, Many." Political Analysis
2. Blinder et al. (2024). "Central Bank Communication." JEL
3. Bholat et al. (2019). "Enhancing Central Bank Communications." Bank of England
4. Cloyne et al. (2024). "Homeownership and Monetary Policy." JME
5. Christelis et al. (2020). "Trust in the Central Bank." IJCB
6. D'Acunto et al. (2024). "Household Inflation Expectations." NBER
7. Horton (2023). "Homo Silicus." NBER
8. Kim & Lee. "Bounded Rationality in Central Bank Communication"
9. Lamla & Vinogradov (2024). "Central Bank Announcements." JME
10. Jung & Mongelli (2025). "Direct Communication." ECB
11. Oborneva, I.V. (2006). Flesch formula adaptation for Russian
12. Bank of Russia WP 148 (2024). "Households' Inflation Expectations: RCT"

---

Study project on central bank communication. Slides: docs/presentation.pdf · Defense speech: docs/speech.md · Русская версия