More ergonomic which#640
Open
stepancheg wants to merge 1 commit intocapnproto:masterfrom
Open
Conversation
d28cee1 to
11bb83b
Compare
07c596b to
a7c50c3
Compare
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #640 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 51.64% 51.02% -0.62%
==========================================
Files 69 71 +2
Lines 33735 32406 -1329
==========================================
- Hits 17422 16536 -886
+ Misses 16313 15870 -443 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In
which()returnResult<Which<Reader>, Error>instead ofResult<Which<Result<Reader, Error>>, NotInSchema>.Extracting
NotInSchemais tricker now, because it is now a variant ofError. Also it is not possible now have more detailed errors which variant is broken.I think it's OK, because:
instead of