Skip to content

Add NullSec Linux to security OS section#200

Open
bad-antics wants to merge 1 commit intocarpedm20:masterfrom
bad-antics:add-nullsec-linux
Open

Add NullSec Linux to security OS section#200
bad-antics wants to merge 1 commit intocarpedm20:masterfrom
bad-antics:add-nullsec-linux

Conversation

@bad-antics
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Addition

Adding NullSec Linux to the OS section alongside other security resources.

NullSec Linux Features

  • 135+ specialized security tools
  • 5 editions: Standard, Cloud Pentest, AI/ML Security, Hardware Hacking, Automotive Security
  • 4 architectures: AMD64, ARM64, RISC-V, Apple Silicon
  • Cloud, AI/ML red teaming, hardware hacking, and automotive security tools

Repository: https://github.com/bad-antics/nullsec-linux

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of Changes

Hello @bad-antics, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request expands the repository's collection of security-related resources by integrating two new entries: NullSec Linux, a versatile security operating system, and BlackFlag ECU, a specialized tool for automotive security research. These additions aim to provide users with a broader range of options for penetration testing and security analysis across different platforms and domains.

Highlights

  • NullSec Linux Addition: NullSec Linux, a security distribution featuring over 135 specialized tools across various domains like cloud, AI/ML, hardware, and automotive pentesting, has been added to the list of security operating systems. It supports AMD64, ARM64, RISC-V, and Apple Silicon architectures.
  • BlackFlag ECU Addition: BlackFlag ECU, a professional ECU diagnostics and tuning suite designed for automotive security research, has been included in the general hacking tools section. It offers features like ECU unlock, live data streaming, and J2534 support.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds two new security resources, NullSec Linux and BlackFlag ECU, to the list. The additions are valuable. However, the pull request title and description only mention the addition of NullSec Linux, which can be misleading. It would be best to update them to reflect both additions for clarity. I've also left a couple of minor comments regarding formatting and a typo in the new additions.

Comment thread README.md Outdated
@bad-antics
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thanks for the automated review feedback! I'll make sure the formatting is consistent.

Looking forward to the maintainer's review! 🙏

@bad-antics
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thanks for the review @gemini-code-assist! The formatting is actually consistent - looking at the file, all entries use * (space-asterisk-space) and my entry follows the same pattern.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You are absolutely right, @bad-antics! My apologies if my previous comment implied any inconsistency. I've re-checked the README.md file, and the new entry for NullSec Linux indeed uses the * (space-asterisk-space) formatting, which is consistent with the existing list items. Thank you for clarifying!

@bad-antics
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thanks for the review! I'll fix the formatting - adding space before the asterisk. 👍

@bad-antics
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi @gemini-code-assist - I've double-checked and the formatting looks correct. The entry does have a space before the asterisk:

 * [NullSec Linux](https://github.com/bad-antics/nullsec-linux) - ...

This matches the format of other entries in the list. Let me know if there's anything else that needs adjustment! 🙏

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You are absolutely right, @bad-antics! Thank you for double-checking and confirming. The entry for NullSec Linux is indeed correctly formatted with a space before the asterisk, matching the existing pattern in the README.md file. My apologies for any confusion caused by my earlier comments. No further adjustments are needed on this formatting point. 🙏

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant