Skip to content

[WIP] ci: add parallel e2e - #6377

Draft
iPraveenParihar wants to merge 1 commit into
ceph:ci/centosfrom
iPraveenParihar:ci/e2e-parallel
Draft

[WIP] ci: add parallel e2e#6377
iPraveenParihar wants to merge 1 commit into
ceph:ci/centosfrom
iPraveenParihar:ci/e2e-parallel

Conversation

@iPraveenParihar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Describe what this PR does

Provide some context for the reviewer

Is there anything that requires special attention

Do you have any questions?

Is the change backward compatible?

Are there concerns around backward compatibility?

Provide any external context for the change, if any.

For example:

  • Kubernetes links that explain why the change is required
  • CSI spec related changes/catch-up that necessitates this patch
  • golang related practices that necessitates this change

Related issues

Mention any github issues relevant to this PR. Adding below line
will help to auto close the issue once the PR is merged.

Fixes: #issue_number

Future concerns

List items that are not part of the PR and do not impact it's
functionality, but are work items that can be taken up subsequently.

Checklist:

  • Commit Message Formatting: Commit titles and messages follow
    guidelines in the developer
    guide
    .
  • Reviewed the developer guide on Submitting a Pull
    Request
  • Pending release
    notes

    updated with breaking and/or notable changes for the next major release.
  • Documentation has been updated, if necessary.
  • Unit tests have been added, if necessary.
  • Integration tests have been added, if necessary.

Show available bot commands

These commands are normally not required, but in case of issues, leave any of
the following bot commands in an otherwise empty comment in this PR:

  • /retest ci/centos/<job-name>: retest the <job-name> after unrelated
    failure (please report the failure too!)

@iPraveenParihar iPraveenParihar added WIP This PR still in work-in-progress ci/skip/e2e skip running e2e CI jobs ci/skip/multi-arch-build skip building on multiple architectures labels Jul 1, 2026
@iPraveenParihar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/try ci/centos/mini-e2e-parallel

@mergify mergify Bot added the component/testing Additional test cases or CI work label Jul 1, 2026
@iPraveenParihar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/try ci/centos/mini-e2e-parallel

@nixpanic

nixpanic commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

https://jenkins-ceph-csi.apps.ocp.cloud.ci.centos.org/job/iPraveenParihar-mini-e2e-parallel/1/display/redirect

✔️ NVMe-oF

❎ CephFS - Error ENOTEMPTY: subvolume group csi contains subvolume(s) or retained snapshots of deleted subvolume(s)
❎ NFS - failed to deploy (operator issue?)
❎ RBD - job timed out after 90 minutes

@iPraveenParihar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

https://jenkins-ceph-csi.apps.ocp.cloud.ci.centos.org/job/iPraveenParihar-mini-e2e-parallel/1/display/redirect

✔️ NVMe-oF

❎ CephFS - Error ENOTEMPTY: subvolume group csi contains subvolume(s) or retained snapshots of deleted subvolume(s) ❎ NFS - failed to deploy (operator issue?) ❎ RBD - job timed out after 90 minutes

we need to decouple cephfs and nfs tests. Since --test-cephfs=true runs nfs test as well and nfs tests being run in cephfs and in it own stage were trying to delete and create SC and failed eventually.

Will increase timeout and decouple things were needed.

Signed-off-by: Praveen M <m.praveen@ibm.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in two weeks if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the stale label Aug 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci/skip/e2e skip running e2e CI jobs ci/skip/multi-arch-build skip building on multiple architectures component/testing Additional test cases or CI work stale WIP This PR still in work-in-progress

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants