Sheldon Fork Testing - #3
Conversation
Removed Aditi Bhaskar as a contributor from the CSL file.
|
Awesome! You just created a pull request to the Citation Styles Language styles repository. One of our human volunteers will try to get in touch soon (usually within a week). In the meantime, I will run some automated checks. You should be notified of the results in a few minutes. If you haven't done so yet, please make sure your style validates and follows all our other Style Requirements. To update this pull request, visit the "Files changed" tab above, click on the ellipsis button in the top-right corner of your style, and then select "Edit file" to start editing: If you have any questions, please leave a comment and we'll get back to you. While we usually respond in English, feel free to write in whatever language you're most comfortable. |
|
😃 Your submission passed all our automated tests. Below are some sample citations generated based on your proposed changes: american-association-of-petroleum-geologists.csl (modified style; unchanged output for sample items)(“CSL search by example,” 2012; Fenner et al., 2019) |
| <author> | ||
| <name>Sebastian Karcher</name> | ||
| </author> | ||
| <contributor> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does this do anything
adam3smith
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Second observation: confirming the token cap on fork PRs for pull_request_review.
Mirrors citation-style-language/styles. pull_request_review caps GITHUB_TOKEN to read-only on fork pull requests -- confirmed twice on #3 here, which got 'PullRequests: read' while the job asked for write -- so the event-driven version could not label the fork PRs that make up almost all of styles. A scheduled run gets a real write token and attaches its check to the default branch instead of to a pull request. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

Removed Aditi Bhaskar as a contributor from the CSL file.