switch off usePixelQualityFlag in TrackerTrackHitFilter in presence of the PixelCPEGeneric modifier#50616
Conversation
…f the PixelCPEGeneric modifier
|
type bugfix |
|
urgent |
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
@cms-sw/trk-dpg-l2 @lpnair @amecca @mroguljic FYI |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-50616/48814 |
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for master. It involves the following packages:
@Alejandro1400, @JanChyczynski, @Moanwar, @arunhep, @atpathak, @cmsbuild, @ctarricone, @gabrielmscampos, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @nothingface0, @perrotta, @rseidita, @srimanob, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
test parameters:
|
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
usePixelQualityFlag in TrackerTrackHitFilter in presence of the PixelCPEGeneric modifierusePixelQualityFlag in TrackerTrackHitFilter in presence of the PixelCPEGeneric modifier
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+1 |
|
+alca |
|
+analysis |
|
@rseidita can you sign also this one ? Thanks! |
|
+dqm |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen, @ftenchini (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 |
PR description:
This PR is a follow-up to #50480.
In that PR the default CPE for track fitting in the 2026 Era was moved to the CPE generic.
Unfortunately this has a knock-on effect on the
TrackerTrackHitFilterwhich has a flag (usePixelQualityFlag) which relies on the template fit information to do hit rejection:cmssw/RecoTracker/FinalTrackSelectors/plugins/TrackerTrackHitFilter.cc
Lines 976 to 997 in 0733146
This is of course not available when the template fit is not run.
This has lead to missing alignment PCL results (see e.g. https://cern.ch/wygsf) and potentially wrong DQM results.
PR validation:
I've re-run the following command (previously failing in
CMSSW_16_0_4_patch2):and verfied the alignment PCL works correctly.
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Not a backport, will need to be urgently backported to CMSSW_16_0_X for 2026 data-taking operations.