SANDBOX-1769 | feature: expose "disabled integrations" in the UIConfig

[MikelAlejoBR]

In order for the UI to be able to consume the field, the registration service needs to expose it via the REST API.

Related PRs

• SANDBOX-1769 | feature: type for "disabled integrations" in the config api#502
  • SANDBOX-1769 | feature: specify integration types with constants api#503 (this one)
• SANDBOX-1769 | feature: "disabled integrations" builder for the tests toolchain-common#524
• SANDBOX-1769 | docs: design of the "disabled integrations" feature host-operator#1255
• SANDBOX-1769 | feature: definition of the "disabled integrations" in the CRD host-operator#1256
• SANDBOX-1769 | feature: expose "disabled integrations" in the UIConfig #590

Jira ticket

[SANDBOX-1769]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • API configuration endpoint now exposes a disabled integrations list in its response (clients receive an empty list when none are configured).
• Tests
  • Added/updated tests to verify the disabled integrations field defaults to an empty list and reflects configured values.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@MikelAlejoBR has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 44 minutes and 41 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 44 minutes and 41 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: af839b6a-8bae-4c3e-839b-dad7acb3878f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3e398b0 and 3a9387d.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• go.mod
• pkg/configuration/configuration.go
• pkg/controller/uiconfig.go
• pkg/controller/uiconfig_test.go

Walkthrough

Adds a DisabledIntegrations() accessor to the registration service configuration and surfaces its value as disabledIntegrations in the UI config HTTP response; tests added to assert default empty slice and configured values.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Configuration accessor pkg/configuration/configuration.go	Added DisabledIntegrations() method on RegistrationServiceConfig that returns r.cfg.Host.RegistrationService.DisabledIntegrations or a non-nil empty []string{} when nil.
UI config response & handler pkg/controller/uiconfig.go	Added DisabledIntegrations []string 'json:"disabledIntegrations"' to UIConfigResponse and populated it in (*UIConfig).GetHandler using cfg.DisabledIntegrations().
Tests pkg/controller/uiconfig_test.go	Extended TestUIConfigHandler to assert default empty disabledIntegrations and added TestUIConfigHandlerWithDisabledIntegrations to verify configured values are returned.
Module dependency go.mod	Updated github.com/codeready-toolchain/api version reference.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: exposing a 'disabled integrations' field in the UIConfig, which aligns with all file modifications.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[mfrancisc]

Looks good 👍

There is also an e2e https://github.com/codeready-toolchain/toolchain-e2e/blob/88eb7f8af09aecd1069bbbe819b27ba152653a80/test/e2e/parallel/registration_service_test.go#L972 could you pls check if that needs to be updated as well.

[MikelAlejoBR]

Good point, thank you!

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alexeykazakov, MikelAlejoBR

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [alexeykazakov]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment