Updated imports

get_camera_matrices.py

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 
 import model
 
-from pandac.PandaModules import *
+from panda3d.core import *
 
 WIDTH = 600
 HEIGHT = 600
@@ -67,4 +67,3 @@ def as_numpy(A):
 
 print('modelview matrix = ')
 print(modelview)
-

render.py

@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
 FOCAL_LENGTH_IN = args.focal_length_in
 FOV_ANGLE_DEG = 54.611362
 
-from pandac.PandaModules import *
+from panda3d.core import *
 
 loadPrcFileData('', 'win-size %d %d'%(WIDTH, HEIGHT))
 loadPrcFileData('', 'win-fixed-size #t')

todo.txt

@@ -1,10 +1,14 @@
 
 Would really be good:
-1. write the camera matrices for each rendered views (corresponding to the ply files) 
+1. write the camera matrices for each rendered views (corresponding to the ply files)
 2. share the code for downloading, converting to .ply and rendering the models. (done)
 
 less important:
 3. get the ply model for 'bec78ebd204764f637a0eda928b574d2' (done)
-4. redo the sampling and rendering to have the exact same orientations (real orientation, including orientation_theta_deg) for all the chairs and avoid having img_1==img_31 and img_32==img_63
+4. redo the sampling and rendering to have the exact same orientations
+   (real orientation, including orientation_theta_deg) for all the chairs
+   and avoid having img_1==img_31 and img_32==img_63
 
-the point was not clear: you had 2 different view angles sets in 'renders' and 'renders_norm_left', and it turns out the ones from the 'renders' are important, but you don't have it for all chairs
+the point was not clear: you had 2 different view angles sets in 'renders'
+and 'renders_norm_left', and it turns out the ones from the 'renders' are important,
+but you don't have it for all chairs