refactor(tests): Enhance heavy ported tests

[marioevz]

🗒️ Description

Manually enhance some of the heaviest python ported tests in tests/ported_static, by programatically generating the bytecode contained in them instead of hard-coding them.

Removes ~322k lines of python code.

@leolara I've added:

@manually-enhanced: Do not overwrite. This test has been manually reviewed and
enhanced.

To the docstring in the header of each test, so we can check for @manually-enhanced to skip these tests when running the script again, wdyt? cc @spencer-tb

🔗 Related Issues or PRs

N/A.

✅ Checklist

• All: Ran fast static checks to avoid unnecessary CI fails, see also Code Standards and Enabling Pre-commit Checks:

  just static

• All: PR title adheres to the repo standard - it will be used as the squash commit message and should start type(scope):.
• All: Considered updating the online docs in the ./docs/ directory.
• All: Set appropriate labels for the changes (only maintainers can apply labels).
• Tests: Ran mkdocs serve locally and verified the auto-generated docs for new tests in the Test Case Reference are correctly formatted.
• Tests: For PRs implementing a missed test case, update the post-mortem document to add an entry the list.
• Ported Tests: All converted JSON/YML tests from ethereum/tests or tests/static have been assigned @ported_from marker.

Cute Animal Picture

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.24%. Comparing base (d986207) to head (8570523).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on forks/amsterdam.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           forks/amsterdam    #2623   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage            86.24%   86.24%           
================================================
  Files                  599      599           
  Lines                36984    36984           
  Branches              3795     3795           
================================================
  Hits                 31895    31895           
  Misses                4525     4525           
  Partials               564      564           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	86.24% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[leolara]

@marioevz I feel that if we do this, we are going to lose the opportunity to do the last step of the automatic porting to eliminate the hardcoded addresses.

I created this PR: #2535 that is in need of review, to be able to do the step of doing that by comparing traces.

I think it would be a good idea to discuss if we want to compare the traces by ignoring the stack or we can have access to the immediate values that are currently not in the trace.

[marioevz]

I've condensed the stTimeConsuming further to make it:

• Much more legible: test cases now show exactly what they are trying to achieve.
• Condensed: All tests now use a pytest parametrize into a single test function.

Commit 3b850b6 can be verified using --verify-traces and --verify-traces-comparator exact-no-stack-no-gas, but further commits break the naming of the tests so they cannot be verified like this.

[marioevz]

cc @spencer-tb I believe this change is necessary because otherwise it would be a pain to verify what happens in each different file and test case for 8037.

[spencer-tb]

LGTM! Just want to confirm the valid from changes were intentional :)
If so feel free to merge!