Add icons directory to package files

[Pek5892]

Prerequisites

• I have read and follow the contributing guidelines
• I have read and accept the Contributor License Agreement (CLA) Document and I hereby sign the CLA

Type of Change

feature

Description

Added icons directory to package files for uses

[hyperz111]

@Pek5892, why we need this? Because from https://packagephobia.com/result?p=ua-parser-js, this change make the install size 2 times bigger (again).

[hyperz111]

@faisalman, maybe you can revert this change?

[Pek5892]

@hyperz111 to include icons on the library

[myersbrittanym-art]

I don't remember subscribing to this.. what is this? Why does it say merge?

…

On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 1:00 AM Valentina ***@***.***> wrote: *Pek5892* left a comment (faisalman/ua-parser-js#823) <#823 (comment)> @hyperz111 <https://github.com/hyperz111> to include icons on the library — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#823 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BV56SQ3STCPC7TKX6J2FCUL4MLKDXAVCNFSM6AAAAACSNILD3CVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTSMJTGE4DQMJQGI> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[hyperz111]

@hyperz111 to include icons on the library

But this is unused and useless.

[askoufis]

@faisalman @Pek5892 Can the reason for including these icons in the package be listed explicitly somewhere? Ideally in the readme, or at least in this PR. I couldn't find any reference to the icons in the code, so I don't understand why they're include in the published package. If they are not needed, then they should be removed.

I consider it beyond the scope of this package's API to handle anything to do with browser/OS icons, so if there is some kind of planned future API that does involve them, maybe it should be published as a separate package instead.

Increasing the size of a package by 830kb (~163%) for no apparent reason and with inadequate communication (the only mention of this was a single line in the changelog) is unacceptable for such a widely used package.