Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Context
This makes the client more flexible when callers need to send auxiliary JSON-safe data alongside the normal FAL input payload.
This is especially useful when using
falbehind a proxy. The proxy already receives and forwards the JSON request body, so a dedicatedextraBodyfield gives applications a clean place for proxy-specific metadata or control values without overloading the model’s top-level input schema. That makes it easier for proxy code to inspect, transform, strip, or act on those fields before forwarding the request upstream.What Changed
extraBodyto client request options forrun, queue submit/subscribe, and streaming{ ...input, extraBody }while keepingextraBodyJSON-safe and untransformedGET/ non-object input cases