Skip to content

[Advanced Compiler]update topk_softmax:add support for renormalize parameter - #1225

Merged
zhangpeiyang1 merged 5 commits into
flagos-ai:masterfrom
AdvancedCompiler:update-topk_softmax
Jan 6, 2026
Merged

[Advanced Compiler]update topk_softmax:add support for renormalize parameter#1225
zhangpeiyang1 merged 5 commits into
flagos-ai:masterfrom
AdvancedCompiler:update-topk_softmax

Conversation

@AdvancedCompiler

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

PR Category

Operator

Type of Change

New Feature

Description

update topk_softmax:add support for renormalize parameter

Issue

Progress

  • Change is properly reviewed (1 reviewer required, 2 recommended).
  • Change is responded to an issue.
  • Change is fully covered by a UT.

Performance

@CLAassistant

CLAassistant commented Dec 16, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ AdvancedCompiler
❌ “ph0375”


“ph0375” seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

“ph0375” added 2 commits December 17, 2025 17:45
@zhangpeiyang1
zhangpeiyang1 merged commit 982b1ba into flagos-ai:master Jan 6, 2026
10 of 14 checks passed
nicelynice pushed a commit to nicelynice/FlagGems that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2026
…rameter (flagos-ai#1225)

* update-topk_softmax:add support for renormalize parameter

* update-topk_softmax:add fp16 and bf16 data type support for input parameter

---------

Co-authored-by: “ph0375” <“ph0375@163.com”>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants