-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 392
@W-20618449: [MSDK 13.1][Android] Cannot login GUS using Welcome endpoint (13.1.1 Patch) #2812
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
JohnsonEricAtSalesforce
merged 1 commit into
forcedotcom:master
from
JohnsonEricAtSalesforce:master
Jan 12, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it matters for this context, but it should be noted that
orandanddiffer from||and&&in that they do not short-circuit.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's true. Kotlin's methods are beneficial here since they increase code coverage. The short-circuit operators produce untestable logic branches which are revealed by CodeCov. That seems well documented online. In many cases I was able to retain the operators and still hit 100% coverage, but this one stumped even the AI tools and they recommended the methods - which worked.
We wouldn't want to use Kotlin's methods if the expressions were costly or had side-effects, obviously. In this case, they're simple booleans.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, interesting! Great use case, especially for non-nullable values.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks☺️
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe there are cases where you specifically would want to ensure a side-effect happens? Like:
if (override.and(atomicInt.addAndGet(1) > MAX))andguarantees the add happens no matter the value ofoverride. Seems pretty niche though.